Never mind that campaign-law violation: Suffolk clerk's office let suspected killer free by mistake

There have been numerous judges who have done some questionable things. Who do you complain to and not fear retaliation of some sort? I feel as though the majority of people hearing complaints a judge will think, "Yeah right".

On friday a judge allowed a previously convicted muderer (who's case was overturned by the SJC due to (WHAT) another error (technicality) in that building)

Let's create a scenario where you are innocent of a crime they claim you committed. Now, let's assume that an error is made by the prosecution (they mixed up DNA samples in the lab) that results in your conviction. Should a judge overturn your verdict and free you even though you are now a previously convicted murderer? Is the fact that you are a "previously convicted murderer" something that should be held against your character for the rest of your life even if you are free to go?

off his bracelet!!!Why?? you may ask....well apparently it gets in his way at work as a mason!! WHAT?? since when does your choice of a job matter when it's a priviledge to be out of jail on bail and not an entitlement...This judge needs to be removed from the bench!!!

It's not a privilege to be out on bail unless you fail to observe the principle of "innocent until proven guilty". I believe GPS monitoring is something that the defendant has to agree to in order to be imposed on him and it is entirely at the discretion of the judge. Unlike GPS monitoring of probation where you have been proven guilty and must be tracked as a condition of your early release from your punishment, monitoring at bail should be less onerous. If he is not guilty of the murder the state claims him to be, then why should he as an innocent man be forced to be tracked? Would you want to be tracked...you know, just in case you are guilty of a crime they think you committed?