Hey, there! Log in / Register
Globe: Oops, we have no proof the Sox were confiscating pro-Orsillo signs
By adamg on Tue, 09/01/2015 - 11:31pm
The Globe's appended this to Dan Shaughnessy's column about Orsillo:
Clarification: Because of a reporting error, an earlier version of this story made reference to signs being confiscated at Fenway Park. The reference has been removed because the Globe could not independently verify that any signs were confiscated at the ballpark. ...
Via Dan Kennedy.
Free tagging:
Ad:
Comments
Any fans heard from?
If anyone went to Fenway and had his or her sign taken a way (and it wasn't oversize or otherwise violating the rules), please step forward.
Who were the sources?
Someone had said three sources told the Globe that the signs would be confiscated. Who were these people? Front-office guys or the sausage sellers?
Easy
Shaugnessey is a troll and thought he could get away with reporting something negative, to get people riled up.
He really has no redeeming qualities as a sports writer or public figure.
because the Globe could not
Isn't that what journalists are supposed to do before they report information as facts?
Independent?
More like John Henry's employees at the Boston Globe could not verify John Henry's employees at Fenway Park were confiscating signs criticizing John Henry's TV station for letting Orsillo go.
I think Jarrod said it right here.
Shank is no gem, but he isn't a liar and his journalistic integrity is rarely questioned. Remember that the Globe/sox/Nesn is the same thing, so take anything there with a grain of salt.
That being said, I don't see Henry or Werner calling down and making the decision to ban signs at the park supporting a guy whom everybody loves.
I'm sure a better answer will come out soon as the sox have a bunch of home games left.
his journalistic integrity is
his journalistic integrity is rarely questioned.
What? There's a whole web site devoted to questioning his journalistic integrity! Dan Shaughnessy Watch