Hey, there! Log in / Register
Political hired gun now involved in Boston Latin issue
By adamg on Mon, 06/27/2016 - 11:51am
The Herald reports longtime political fixer Michael Goldman is now "troubleshooting the media" for the mayor when they cover the ongoing Boston Latin School issue. City Hall and the Bolling Building both insist, however, that Goldman has absolutely no access to confidential records, so we guess we'll just need to keep speculating on who might have leaked confidential student disciplinary information to the Globe on Friday.
Neighborhoods:
Topics:
Free tagging:
Ad:
Comments
Do the right thing
All this trouble can be traced back to pandering. Politicians pander to special interests who have access to the news media. The politicians are more concerned with their political careers instead of doing the right thing. How many investigations are happening against the city administration now--4--? Each one is because of pandering to special interests. If there were term limits, these politicians wouldn't have to worry about their reelection efforts. They could concentrate on doing what is right for the common good and wouldn't have to be concerned with what the media says about their lack of political correctness. The founding fathers weren't career politicians. They were farmers and blacksmiths and people with real jobs and real concerns about the well being of people. But what did they know. They worked with their hands and didn't have Facebook.
No actually
Term limits don't make self-interested people suddenly prioritize the public good over their own fortunes.
Instead of thinking about reelection to their current job, they think about how to position themselves to be hired by their favorite industry/lobbying firm OR they start looking at other political offices.
Blacksmiths?
The founding fathers were mostly lawyers, merchants, land speculators, financiers, and slaveowners. Arguably not too different than modern politicians, and just as then as now, public office was frequently an arrangement to advance personal financial interests.
More than just lawyers, etc.
The Founders of the nation wore many identities. That of lawyer is not surprising since law was a major concern. Government can not exist without law defining it. Yet Adams, Jefferson and Washington were all farmers, intellectuals and in Washington's case a career soldier. They were religious, many Deists and they were willing to risk their lives to accomplish what was a radical idea: self governance. So to reduce them to lawyers, speculators, financiers and slave owners ignores that many of them also responded to noble callings as well as their personal interests.
They and people such as Adam Smith also understood that the motivations of greed, desire for power, wealth and priviledge were as much of human identity as love and kindness. They subscribed to the foundational belief that since these motivations can not be eliminated (the Soviet Union and China proved that) that then should be harnessed. Hence capitalism.
So the question is not whether term limits are no less effective in directing the inevitable selfish human motivations toward the greater good but what form of leadership is best today for directing the raw materal of human desire to the greater good.
As for term limits most Founders did not see a need in their time. Washington however did however choose to retire after two terms and set a Presidentail precedent until Roosevelt.
Would term limits however be appropriate for today? Is goverment working as well as it should for the common good today? Many argues that today Congress is the most ineffective branch today. That is understandable since the majority party in both houses has as its philosophy that no governance is the best governance. Agree with that principle and there is not reason to change. But if the legilature is expected to have any active role in the life of a nation then term limits might be the only way to bring back to life what has become a moribund institution.
Considering that the Legislature is doing their best to undermine government such as by preventing judicial appointments and limiting themselves in what they do with Executive and regulatory agencies, perhaps Congress needs a major overhaul to get rid of legislators who do nothing more than bloviate at hearings.
How much taxpayer money is
How much taxpayer money is Walsh spending to control the message going out to the taxpayers?
Assuming you mean Goldstein ...
Zero, because he's being paid by Walsh's re-election campaign.
you can modify and recycle your previous headline
Assclown defaces Boston exam school.
What does 'troubleshooting the media' mean, adam?
Is it stuff like convincing the Glob to purge all the comments from the alleged 'inside leak' article they ran on Friday - "City finds..."
The majority of the comments were pretty anti-Walsh and anti-Court Street. Now all the comments are gone.
Mahty forgot for a minute
Who votes in this city. Maybe Goldman can watch his car if he shows up at Holy Name next fall.
Let's start a movement
Adam, it's time to start a movement for term limits.
Too late my friend
The late honorable Mayor Menino failed to exercise any real effective leadership over BPS for decades While I'm not a Marty fan, the fact that Walsh started in a poor position isn't all his fault. The last years of Menino and Johnson's partnership were totally rudderless and their health and interest level waned without either stepping down early enough.
Time to Start a Movement
Well, two movements:
1) for upset parents to start their own little special private school
2) for BLS staff to understand that they are not exempted from anti-bullying laws or from accommodating special needs.
3) Tech, Biotech, Startup people to
decide to move somewhere with better schools.
Dare I ask - how much does this Goldman guy cost?
Is he just doing this for free?
He's being paid by the Walsh campaign
So an enterprising reporter could find out after the next reporting deadline for Mass. politicians.
In other Marty campaign news...
Former (and future likely) Walsh campaign flack Kate Norton (IndyBoston spokesperson) claimed on Twitter that CK Strategies (her employer run by Marty's campaign manager) had not been paid as a vendor for IndyBoston. I'd be interesting to know if they (Norton, Keohan, etc...) were continuing to get paid by Marty Walsh's campaign structure to work for IndyBoston or not. Or are they actually just writing off the past year of effort as a sunk cost on a failed venture.
I suspect they aren't eating ramen noodles for dinner due to IndyBoston stiffing the ticket purchasers and vendors.
Bait and switch
How many people were working for the administration while living outside the city and moved to the Olympic payroll yet functioned (and still function) as employees of the administration? Was part of the deal with Indy, the Olympics, and other entities that they pay these city workers on their payrolls even though they still work in their capacity within the administration in an effort to skirt the residency rules? There is so much corrupt chicanery going on that you'd need the efforts of the entire Boston FBI office to just keep track of half of it.
OPERATION PLUNDERDOME
We did it before, and we can do it again.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Plunder_Dome
Gratis most likely....
https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2016/02/27/pair-has-easy-access-office...