The Harvard Crimson reports the Cambridge City Council yesterday passed a one-year moratorium on chopping down trees in Cambridge, unless they're dead or declared "dangerous."
If someone in city government doesn't like you, they can wait to declare a tree dangerous until only after it does something aggressive...like fall on your house.
Your supposed rage-filled city tree warden could do that even without this ordinance. In fact, in Massachusetts, the most you can really do about a tree on your neighbor's property that is giving you menacing looks or whatever is to prune the part of the tree that overhangs your property.
There's even a name for it: The Massachusetts Rule, which contrasts with the Hawaii Rule, in which you can take action against a neighbor's tree. Somebody tried to get the SJC to overturn the Massachusetts Rule. The court refused, just last year, in fact, in a decision that concluded changing the rule could lead to the sort of angry viciousness you impute to the lowly tree warden:
The Massachusetts rule today, just as it did when [the 1931 case] was decided, may prevent unnecessary legal harassment from neighbors who merely have an axe to grind for reasons other than purported tree problems.
NIMBYism cloaked in environmentalism is the most toxic combination there is when it comes to preventing new housing in our supposedly progressive cities and towns. That's all this actually is.
Comments
Wonderful
If someone in city government doesn't like you, they can wait to declare a tree dangerous until only after it does something aggressive...like fall on your house.
Paranoia's a helluva drug
Your supposed rage-filled city tree warden could do that even without this ordinance. In fact, in Massachusetts, the most you can really do about a tree on your neighbor's property that is giving you menacing looks or whatever is to prune the part of the tree that overhangs your property.
There's even a name for it: The Massachusetts Rule, which contrasts with the Hawaii Rule, in which you can take action against a neighbor's tree. Somebody tried to get the SJC to overturn the Massachusetts Rule. The court refused, just last year, in fact, in a decision that concluded changing the rule could lead to the sort of angry viciousness you impute to the lowly tree warden:
Liability is just as well ---
Liability is just as well --- Duey Suem and Howe
check it out , that thinking
check it out , that thinking is costly ,
Wrongful death claim filed against Abington after tree killed Whitman couple
https://www.enterprisenews.com/news/20160721/wrongful-death-claim-filed-...
Abington targets bad trees in wake of Whitman couple’s tragedy
https://www.enterprisenews.com/news/20161116/abington-targets-bad-trees-...
Bad trees?
The only think that can stop a bad neighbor with a tree is a good neighbor with a tree.
NIMBYism cloaked in environmentalism
NIMBYism cloaked in environmentalism is the most toxic combination there is when it comes to preventing new housing in our supposedly progressive cities and towns. That's all this actually is.
This law came to be because
This law came to be because people were angry at Harvard for cutting down some trees to expand the Divinity School.
However, Harvard is far better equipped to overcome this bureaucracy than small property owners.