Budding pot war on Boylston Street: Owner of one dispensary sues to block another
The owners of a dispensary on Boylston Street between Gloucester and Fairfield streets in the Back Bay yesterday sued the operators of a proposed dispensary three blocks down the street - and the Zoning Board of Appeal, which approved both.
The lawsuit is the latest to test the validity of the city's little enforced ban on marijuana establishments being closer than a half mile to each other. Last year, the operator of a proposed dispensary on Harvard Avenue in Allston sued after the zoning board approved a competing shop down the street, citing the buffer ordinance. That case remains open.
Since its passage in 2016, City Hall has routinely ignored the buffer-zone concept, with both the Boston Cannabis Board and the zoning board routinely granting exceptions. Even Councilor Michael Flaherty, who came up with the idea, has since occasionally supported close-by shops, arguing that he is now satisfied oversight by city boards means Boston won't see the sort of "green mile" pot strips he once worried about.
The newest suit, filed in Suffolk Superior Court, is by Sira Naturals of Milford, which runs a pot shop under the name of its New York parent company, Ayr , and its landlord. In it, they charge the Zoning Board had no valid reasons to grant a variance to former City Councilor Josh Zakim's Copley Connection at 551 Boylston St., where the Wendy's used to be, between Dartmouth and Clarendon streets.
Not only is the proposal by Zakim and his partners less than a half mile from the Ayr shop, which opened last year, it might violate another provision of the buffer ordinance that bars marijuana stores near schools, because it might be less than 500 feet from the Snowden International School. At the zoning hearing at which he won approval in April, Zakim said the store entrance is 600 feet from the Snowden's main entrance.
Sira says granting variances requires proof of some unique attributes of a site that warrant an exception to the site's zoning and the old Wendy's has none of those, so it's asking a judge to "annul" the zoning board approval.
Copley Connection has until Dec. 7 to file an answer to the legal complaint, according to the court docket - which also shows that a judgment in the case is not due until August, 2025.
Watch the Copley Connection zoning hearing:
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Complete complaint | 588.36 KB |
Ad:
Comments
One good thing about now
One good thing about now having marijuana dispensaries, the owners (dealers) can now sue each other. Before dealers would just be shooting at each other to protect their turf.
Former electeds should have
Former electeds should have not been able to start permitting for pot shops for 5 years after they left office. Tito, Zakim, Cabral and on and on. Not simply due to chance.
Turf wars
in the legal drug dealing community
End the Dispensary Desert!
What could be more important? Why should the denizens of Upper Boylston Street have to travel so far for their highly priced, highly taxed, and highly fragrant treats?
Let's hope the decidedly non-connected, just-a-regular-guy Mr. Zakim gets treated fairly and gets to keep his variance. Here's hoping his establishment can fill one of the countless empty storefronts with a business guaranteed to appeal to the nearby residents of the Boston Public Library benches and Copley Square, not to mention neighborhood schoolchildren!
"Highly fragrant"?
I think not. One thing I have noticed about today's legally available pot (which I admit I have not tried) is that it smells entirely different than the distinct and definitive aroma of pot that I knew as a high schooler in the 1970s. It was unmistakable. Today's legal and widely available pot smells like rancid chocolate. I wonder what changed?
Agreed. I hate the smell.
I'm all for edibles and tinctures and whatever else doesn't smell, but we never should have legalized the noxious smokeable products.
"Budding pot war..."
Well done, Sir. Can't believe I missed that the first time!