Hey, there! Log in / Register

Nazi social/cryptocurrency network got its initial financing from Boston venture capitalists

By adamg on Thu, 10/03/2024 - 10:12am

GBH reports a Boston-based venture firm funneled money to an effort by a New Hampshire Libertarian cryptobro who has now added GBH reports to a list of people he feels should be executed, including Kamala Harris.

Topics: 
Business
Free tagging: 
Nazis


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

By Percy L on Thu, 10/03/2024 - 6:11pm.

Globally replace "crypto" with "klepto".

Search for "kleptograph" and globally reverse to "cryptograph".

By jmeltzer on Fri, 10/04/2024 - 8:38am.

The douchebro culture is full of fascists. Why shouldn't they be here, too?

By Daan on Fri, 10/04/2024 - 1:46pm.

It is used far too much for dark web drug uses, murder for hire payments and the means for selling weapons of mass murder. It does not serve any socially beneficial purpose. It is in effect an imitation of money which legally only the Federal government may issue.

For those reasons it is time for Congress to eliminate cryptocurrency.

It is also time to start regulating social media in all of its forms. Social media is not journalism. Therefore it does not have 1st Amendment protection.

There is conduct that as a society we agree is to be banned. Public nudity is banned. There is no scientific justification. It is a social norm. The same criteria can be applied to social media when social media is used to overtly support violence. Advocating death of a person (which is advocating murder) should be banned. Would we accept posting flyers that advocate murder on a local physical bulletin board? No. Would we accept any business taping to their window facing passersby a flyer advocating murder? No. For every legal right there are accepted limits. Even Anton Scalia, in his false interpretation of the 2nd Amendment, nevertheless agreed that the 2nd Amendment is not absolute. He agreed that there are limits

Free speech does not extend to speech that advocates violence or murder. It is time to ban extreme speech.

Who decides what is extreme? That part has to be worked out. But allowing calls for murder and violence and allowing technologies that permit the organization and funding of violence at a national scale needs to end.