Hey, there! Log in / Register

Wu proposes $110-million loan fund to help spur more housing in Boston; could get additional money from state

Mayor Wu says she will ask the City Council to approve a $110-million rotating fund to help tip the balance on new housing developments whose builders would otherwise hold back because of the high cost of financing these days - with the first project to be a mixed-income apartment building as part of the complete overhaul of Bunker Hill housing project.

In recent years, developers have won city approval for roughly 30,000 housing units that they then never built.

Wu's proposed Housing Accelerator Fund would lend money to developers at lower rates than they could get on the open market for projects that meet city and state goals of affordability, climate resilience and "equity" - giving lower-income residents a way to build wealth through home ownership, which in Boston would mean financing some condo projects. At least 20% of the units in any project that receives a city loan would have to be rented or marketed as affordable - as compared to the 17% requirement for larger projects that are funded in other ways.

As the developers pay back the loans, the money would go back into the fund for other projects.

The funds to start lending would come from money the city has sitting in the bank, with additional money expected from the state's new Housing Momentum Fund.

The first project Wu would fund is a nine-story, 265-unit apartment building with 58 affordable units as part of a larger project by Leggat McCall and the Joseph J. Corcoran Co. at the Bunker Hill development in Charlestown. The developers plan to replace all of Bunker Hill project's 1,100 low-income apartments and to then add 1,599 additional apartments, ranging from new low-income apartments to market-rate units. Construction of the new building to be partially funded by the city fund could begin next summer.

Wu said she will formally ask the council for its approval at its next meeting, on Dec. 4. However, given that that is at the end of the council's legislative year, which might not give it enough time to hold a normally required hearing, she might have to resubmit the proposal in January.

Among the proposal's backers is Councilor Brian Worrell - who had proposed a similar $150-million fund. He said he was particularly happy with the mayor's decision to include condos as eligible for loans.

When we talk about home ownership, what we’re really talking about is stability and ensuring our Boston residents can stay in Boston. t is about providing real stability and pathways to economic empowerment. And the equity that these people and families are building are not only a tool to build wealth personally, but a crucial step to address the extreme wealth divide in this city.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Could be used for property tax relief for those who are struggling to make their mortgage and their property tax? How bout we index the property tax, one of the most regressive taxes as it presumes every property owner has the same ability to pay their per thousand rate? So a Uber Wealthy taxpayer is charged the same rate per thousand as a Blue Collar taxpayer? Not very progressive.

While the goal seems noble all those details....possible pork barrel type stuff? Certain developers get approved, certain projects get variances, of course maybe a board to dispense the loans completely impartial of course, no chance of playing political favorites.....pay to play as we say....Curley would have loved it.

up
13

Owns an uber wealthy property and pays significantly more in property taxes than a blue collar owner with a more modest property. Both owners are using essentially the same city resources yet the uber wealthy owner is paying significantly more.

I agree with you on property taxes offset though. There’s a $400M deficit and property taxes will have to be raised to offset, but then all of a sudden there’s $110M in the bank to loan to wealthy developers?! As a Boston property tax payer, this type of bullshit infuriates me.

up
15

As she’s Bostons self described dignitary.

The state should focus on building housing outside of Boston, not everyone can afford to live in Boston. Focus on building out the MBTA to allow people to live outside of the city.

Most other states with our population have more than one hub. Let’s invest in Worcester.

up
15