Hey, there! Log in / Register

311 complaint of the day: Oh, chute!

Old coal-chute cover on Pembroke Street

A concerned resident files a 311 complaint about a small busted manhole cover in front of one residence on Pembroke Street in the South End:

in front of 93 Pembroke St, there is a broken manhole cover. It appears it might be city related. The cover blocks a boiler room so repair is needed.

Of course, grizzled UHub readers know that is no manhole cover, but instead a coal-chute cover, installed back in the Victorian era when Bostonians still mostly heated their homes with coal - via deliveries they got through chutes in front of their homes.

The glass prisms fed light into darkened basements and let homeowners see roughly how much coal they had left.

Although some of the chutes were filled in, and the covers replaced, the sadder downward-looking residents of places such as the Back Bay and the South End know from their constant glances that many of them covers remain. Also, they are the responsibility of homeowners, not the city.

In this particular case, a bit of research in Google Books and the Globe archives reveals that D. Stanton of the long gone 123 Essex St. was Daniel Stanton, blacksmith, who is listed in both 1879 and 1882 city directories.

And that's about all we could find about him, except for an 1886 anecdote from the Globe about how he got taken by a 14-year-old rascal who had somehow convinced him he'd be a worthy employee - until the day Stanton gave the lad $3.10 to take over to the local Royal Arcanum to pay his annual dues and the rapscallion returned with a receipt that he had, in fact forged, which Stanton discovered when he got a note from the Royal Arcanum treasurer inquiring why he hadn't paid his dues yet. The kid was hauled into court and while his mother pleaded for leniency, at least until his father could be summoned from somewhere north of Boston, the judge ordered him held in lieu of $1,000 bail.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

They know it's a mechanical room below so was it the owner or super who mistakenly thought it was the city's problem? Slightly humorous they assumed Boston would fix it for them. (And was trying to speed the process by showing them the exact measurement.)

Tangentially related, how do people deal with the water that must seep in during rain? Even in the coal days, it must have left the presumably dirt basement muddy and damp.

up
16

People would call me when their dishwasher broke in the unit they owned.

I would explain that they owned it and would be responsible for it. There would be befuddlement on the other side of the line.

The Google clearly shows this is on private property.

The assessment of the 3 units collectively is over $4.1M.

Is there a middle finger emoji that the City can use to answer this complaint?

up
47

I feel like you should have started a dishwasher repair business where you took 10% and outsourced it to someone.

That's quite a nice one, with only one missing lens. I hope they will just fill that hole if it's necessary rather than remove the whole thing and pave the opening with something boring.

Thanks for the research, Adam!

up
45

Got really carried away with her bedazzler ...

up
17

A blacksmith would have a fancy coal chute. Imagine they went through a lot.

up
12

...manufactured this manhole cover. His name and address advertised his wares.

Someone named Jer. Mora owned 93 Pembroke circa 1890,

up
25

That’s no manhole cover, it’s a space station!

up
29

That just about made my day to see a tangible bit of history exists today. The city should offer to care for them as relics.

up
14

Professional posters use a banana for scale.

up
18

n/t

It was about 1992 while looking for a house to buy. It was a house built in the late 1890's/early 1900's(?) in West Roxbury. Just a big pile of coal sitting in one corner of the basement.

Don't remember anything else. Just a vivid memory of all that coal. Wonder if it's still there.

up
16

The customary boilerplate Purchase and Sale Agreement language, "....broom clean condition..." obviously was overlooked.

But instead of coal it was bees.

Well, maybe uncommon to find that much. The house my husband grew up in had an oil fired boiler, but his parents had replaced the coal boiler before he was born. Most of the coal was either used up or removed, except for some chunks left behind in odd corners of the cellar.

Any historians in the industry out there who can explain why that one and others around like it were crafted with those inlays?
So cool.

It's in the post @anon. The inlays (prisms) give just enough light to see how much coal is left.

up
18

They allowed light into the coal cellar safely, because lighting a candle or a lamp around coal dust could cause an explosion. The covers also have raised designs for traction in rain or snow. Practical and decorative! You can still find a few covers with amethyst lenses around Back Bay. The most striking one is on upper Marlborough Street.

Content like this is why I read Universal Hub. Thanks Adam! ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

up
33

they can probably make a replacement lens, and install for an additional fee.

up
10