Boston cop who used to stand outside the mayor's house yelling about Covid-19 sues over her firing, says it violated her free-speech and religious rights
Shana Cottone, fired as a Boston Police sergeant in 2023, this week sued to get her job back, charging she was terminated as retaliation for exercising her First Amendment religious and free-speech rights by refusing Covid-19 shots and then organizing protests against city Covid-19 policies, which included early morning, bullhorn-enhanced protests outside Mayor Wu's Roslindale home and the swarming of two Boston pizzerias by people who refused to show proof of vaccination.
In her suit, filed in US District Court in Boston on Wednesday, Cottone says she had a First Amendment right to refuse shots because of "firmly held religious beliefs," and a First Amendment right to protest city policies that required employee shots and that prohibited, for a two-month period, people from entering locations where the public might gather without showing proof of vaccination.
Police Commissioner Michael Cox's decision to fire her in March, 2023, was blatant retaliation for her exercising those rights, specifically for the complaint she filed on Jan. 2, 2022 with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination over the city's refusal to grant her a religious exemption for the shot, she alleges. Part of her proof: The fact that "dozens" of other BPD officers who have done far worse things "only received a slap on the wrist" for their violations of department policies and the law.
Cottone is represented in this case, her second against the city over Covid-19, by Mark Gagliardi of Providence.
Gagliardi also represents fellow vaccine denier Joseph Abasciano, who was fired as a BPD officer the same day as Cottone and who is also suing the city, both over his refusal to get shots and tweets he posted supporting the failed Jan. 6 coup. He recently won a moral victory when the state Civil Service Commission rescinded his firing, saying he had a right as a private citizen to offer his opinions while off duty.
In her complaint, Cottone says she grew concerned about then mayoral candidate Michelle Wu when Wu called for requiring city employees to get vaccinated against Covid-19, and that after Wu was elected, organized a group called Boston First Responders United to help city workers file for exemptions to the shots and to protest against the policy.
Cottone alleges that her supervisor at District E-5 in West Roxbury, Capt. Darrin Greeley, took umbrage to that and the "No vax mandate, no vax passport" she had scrawled on her personal car and derided her in front of other officers as being "stupid for not taking the vaccine" - "or words to that effect" - several times.
Cottone claims that after the city council passed an ordinance prohibiting early morning protests, she was the only protester outside the mayor's house to be criminally charged - in a case that was later dismissed. Part of the case against her was that she used a bullhorn - in her complaint, she alleges that "no police officer ever witnessed her using a bull horn," only that somebody had "heard a voice" that sounded like hers.
Her complaint says that no BPD or city employees or members of the public "ever complained to the BPD or the City of Boston about Cottone's position against the Covid 19 vaccine mandate" and that she had a First Amendment right to speak out against it.
While speaking and protesting against the Covid 19 vaccine mandate as a private person outside of the workplace, Cottone did not identify herself as an employee of the City of Boston.
While speaking and protesting against the Covid 19 vaccine mandate as a private person outside of the workplace, Cottone did not reference any matters pertaining to her position as a police officer, the BPD or the City of Boston.
The complaint continues:
Because there were no complaints by any police officers, City of Boston employees or members of the public about Cottone's position against the Covid-19 mandate in which Cotton commented upon matters of public concern, the efficiency of the public services the City of Boston performs through te BPD - preventing crime, protecting and serving the community, and upholding the laws of the city, state, and country - was not disrupted in any way.
And what Wu allowed Cox to do was so egregious and obviously unconstitutional, a judge must let Cottone sue her individually, none of this sovereign immunity nonsense should be permitted, the complaint states.
The complaint is at odds with the BPD "findings of fact" used by Cox to fire her.
That report, written by BPD Deputy Supt. Richard Dahill, found that Cottone had violated department policies while both on and off duty in several cases, including allegedly abandoning her post as E-5 patrol supervisor on Dec. 23, 2021 to attend a roll call at District B-3 at which Wu was to speak - and then continued to record the roll call on her phone even after commanding officers told her to stop, at one point putting her phone in her pocket, but with the camera lens still poking out.
That incident, Dahill's report states, was two days after Cottone, in charge of assigning officers to various tasks at E-5, refused at roll call to order anybody to stand watch outside the mayor's house - standard policy since at least the Menino era - stating Wu "does not want us there." Then, after roll call, she angrily demanded Greeley tell her why BPD should do anything for a mayor who "was harming officers through the COVID-19 mandate," Dahill wrote.
As for the protests outside the mayor's house, Cottone "was observed on two occasions to be utilizing a bullhorn to loudly shout remarks in the direction of the Mayor's house at a volume that could be heard at a distance of 100 feet," and that on one of those occasions, Cottone "was observed entering her personal vehicle and proceeding to follow the Mayor's vehicle while yelling chants through a noise amplification device."
The report also found Cottone violated numerous department policies for her conduct towards other officers, the public, and the law in two incidents on Jan. 15, 2022, when an off-duty Cottone and a group of other anti-vaxxers caused disruptions at Penguin Pizza on Mission Hill and Regina Pizzeria in the Fenway by demanding service, refusing to show proof of vaccination and then refusing to leave.
Both incidents ended with Cottone arguing with and deriding the on-duty officers the restaurants called to have them removed, including calling some of the officers "Nazis" and "followers," telling one he was a disgrace to his uniform and, at one point, telling on-duty officers at Penguin Pizza that they were "dismissed." She also allegedly insulted pizzeria workers who told her she had to leave, Dahill wrote.
This is the second time Cottone has sued Boston.
In 2021, she joined with several other people to sue over the city's indoor vaccination-proof requirement, citing her treatment at the pizza places. In 2023, a federal judge dismissed the case, not because it was moot, since the city rescinded the policy after a couple of months, but because neither Cottone nor any of the other plaintiffs had legal grounds to bring it:
The embarrassment and distress Cottone suffered at the pizza establishments are not tied to any action taken by Defendants. Neither are the consequences Officer Cottone suffered as a result of actions undertaken independently by the Boston Police Department.
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Complete complaint | 175.94 KB |
Ad:
Comments
If only there was a vaccine to prevent…
… attention seeking idiocy and slowing of the wheels of justice with belligerent wasting of valuable court time and resources.
There is
It is mandatory from age about K to about 12.
A police sergeant
who engages in disturbing the peace...
I would think her protesting
I would think her protesting exploits would be enough to can her…
They have a union
Say what you will about cops, but they walk the walk with not cutting each other's throats.
I’d say she has already figuratively….
… cut their throats by behaving so despicably.
Good point, officer
We should fix that too. Sounds like Officer Bullhorn has some free time, she could make a list of these offenders to add to her suit.
She unfortunately has a point
And there is unfortunately quite a bit of case law backing up "cops can do pretty much whatever."
A point how?
If the other cops were doing the exact same thing, she'd have a point. She's not going to make a case on "but BOBBY stole snacks from the break room!".
I guess she was out sick the
I guess she was out sick the day of kindergarten when they explained how "everyone else is doing it" is not a valid excuse.
I’d love to know how that
flies with her snitches get stitches comment.
people need to understand..
being an asshole is not a religion.
Honestly, …
…. this should be on our dollar bills instead of “in god we trust”.
She would seem to be an
She would seem to be an adherent of the Me-Ist faith, whose adherents believe that they're more important and special than anyone else. Very popular religion, especially among cops, the wealthy, and Harvard students.
Name
Reading this reads like a rap sheet. This woman is no innocent face, and seems like she's had several issues that her commanders had issue with, so her termination isn't just because of what she did to Wu.
Of course this is her second time suing because you know, her name has been in print so any potential employer is going to know what shannagains she will bring to any position she applies for. So who would want her? Well outside of other MAGAt employers who might.
So instead she sues again in hope she gets her job back or some sort of payout for her 'problems'.
This is why its important not to be sue happy when it comes to employers. Its fine to sue if you've been wrong'd but understand that if you don't have a clear open and closed case where the employer was at fault, your name is going to be dragged thru the mud. And that could effect your ability to get future employment. You have to decide if its a hill worth dying on.(I've been here myself so I speak from experience)
Sounds like she was
Sounds like she was terminated for her outrageous behavior and abuse of power. She was on duty for some of the incidents and in another she tried to use her status as an officer to influence other officers at the pizza parlors.
Her other behavior is very troubling and in my opinion grounds for termination but her derelict of duty alone should be enough. Also following the Mayor around in a car yelling at her is not behavior one wants in an officer.
She is trying to make this about the vaccine refusal and protesting but in reality she went above and beyond and showed that she is unfit for the position she held. Even people who do not like the vaccines should see how her behavior put other officers and the public in danger.
I'm sure "Covid Cottone" didn
I'm sure "Covid Cottone" didn't realize that organizing extortion of public businesses through intimidation was a crime. You have to keep in mind that she had been dealing with all those other sustained Internal Affairs investigations before Covid-19 even hit. What's a new found religion enthusiast to do? Do we know what religion she follows?
https://www.wokewindows.org/officers/106714-shana-cottone
With cops like her
Who needs bad guys?
Haha!
She’s more the America’s Dumbest Criminal type.
Rageholic
Former Sergeant Cottone sounds like someone who is alive with rage making, not peace making. Which of course is not what is needed as a police officer. If she is a rageholic then why did she manage to stay a cop and receive promotions?
But then there is a power addict who is a rageholic about to retake (was there a war?) the throne of national power. A failure of democracy which raises a fundamental question of whether the nation of the United States has reached the point where it cannot exist as nation.
A weird and hopefully hysterical comparison: Trump retaking the White House, turning it into his castle (well, Mar-a-Lardo is his real castle) but being supported by a legislative body of petty and major oliarchs has he morphs into emperor. Loose, broad stroke similarities with the morphing of the Roman Republic to the Roman Empire. The good news being that the Roman Republic was hardly more than an oligarchy.
Consider? Would be emperor Trump appoints billionaires as his satraps of executive power. Which as a group could be called oligarchs. Legislature, Executive Branch and Judicial branch all run by oligarchs?
Yea, hysteria.
Why was she still on the force?
You can thank a union for that one.
Actually don’t think the
Actually don’t think the unions backed her.
She was a known problem child within the department for years even before this. If we saw her walking down the hallway, 90% of BPD cops would walk the other way because she had a pretty bad reputation even years before covid.
Same with Abasciano.
This one is more on the department because sometimes they seem really afraid to fire the people who really need to be fired (and none of us would complain).
Fire the problems BPD, you know who they are. We all do. If the bells are ringing, listen.
- a Boston Cop
Not "a union", a police union
Not "a union", a police union.
The one thing a cop can get successfully fired for:
Political speech. She would have been better off committing almost any other offense (taking a bribe, drunk driving, beating somebody up, etc) and those arbitrator guys would have her back on the job with back pay in a jiffy.
Look at her record
She's committed all of the things you mention and more.
She also didn't get fired for political speech, it was for things that she did while on duty (though they were based on her wingnut beliefs).