Boston police officer suspended without pay after indictment on charges he beat an Uber driver
A Suffolk County grand jury today indicted Michael Doherty, 41, of South Boston on assault-and-battery and civil-rights charges for an incident in January in which he allegedly used a racial epithet while attacking an Uber driver he claimed had brought him to the wrong address.
Police Commissioner William Evans said he has suspended Doherty without pay:
This should send a strong message that this type of behavior will not be tolerated or ignored. I hold my officers to the highest of standards, and will take swift serious action if any should choose to conduct themselves inappropriately.
According to the Suffolk County District Attorney's office and BPD, the grand jury indicted Doherty on two counts of assault and battery and one count each of assault and battery for purposes of intimidation, violation of constitutional rights, and use of a motor vehicle without authority.
The DA's office and BPD provided this account of what happened early on Jan. 4, when the Uber driver picked up Doherty in Charlestown and drove him to South Boston:
When they arrived at the destination, Doherty allegedly told the driver they were in the wrong location and used a racial epithet in the verbal exchange that followed. Doherty allegedly began hitting the victim, who exited the vehicle to escape the assault; Doherty then exited and chased the man around the vehicle.
As the victim flagged down a passing car driven by another Uber driver, Doherty entered the victim’s 2005 Toyota Prius and drove away, prosecutors said. The victim entered the second Uber car and the two men followed Doherty until he stopped and exited the vehicle at East 1st Street and Farragut Road. There, Doherty allegedly approached both men and used another racial epithet against the second man. Doherty knocked the Uber driver the ground and began hitting him; after the second victim came to the man’s aid, the three men became involved in a physical struggle. Doherty then left the scene.
His arraignment date in Suffolk Superior Court has yet to be set, the DA's office reports. He had previously been charged in South Boston Municipal Court.
Innocent, etc.
Ad:
Comments
For how long?
a day? a week?
I would assume until his
I would assume until his trial is over. NO?
Scumbag
This psychopath should be fired, not suspended.
Just guessing, here
Just guessing here, but I would imagine the rule is, that an officer can be suspended upon indictment, but can't be summarily fired without either a conviction or the conclusion of an internal disciplinary process.
I'm OK with that.
Original story:
Original story:
http://www.bostonherald.com/news_opinion/local_coverage/2015/01/bpd_vete...
Related Story from November 2014:
http://boston.cbslocal.com/2014/11/03/boston-woman-allegedly-breaks-into...
Yep.
Labor law basically says that jobs are like property rights, and he government cannot take away this property without due process.
What about employment at will?
Obviously a cop who is a member of a union can rely upon a contract. But are not most jobs controlled by the employment at will doctrine as far as hiring and firing is concerned?. All employers can fire anyone so long as the reason is not prohibited by law.
The irony is
All the evidence for termination is tied up in the criminal prosecution.
Remember
He's currently an alleged psychopath. Suspension is the correct action until he has been convicted (if he is).
He doesn't have to be convicted either.
What usually happens is guys like this resign. Although that means he will get some of his pension, it eliminates the chance of him winning in an arbitration hearing and keeping his job.
So, why he didn't he get
So, why he didn't he get charged with stealing the car... If it was a civilian.. that charge would be added..
Well if he loses his job as a police officer
there is an opening for a program coordinator over at English High.
Good for Bill Evans.
Good for Bill Evans.
Like every other profession that there are some officers who are great policemen whom we all benefit from them being on the jog and others who give a bad name to the profession. I've always been puzzled by the circle the wagons mentality that protects those who should be in another line of work.
I always thought that the good cops must silently steam when bad actors are allowed to continue without any real consequences.