Hey, there! Log in / Register
Does Yvonne Abraham read Slate?
By adamg on Wed, 10/22/2008 - 11:54pm
Take the local angle (Dorchester ACORN office broken into) away from Abraham's Wednesday column and she says absolutely nothing that Dahlia Lithwick didn't write last Thursday on Slate. She even cites the same Barnard professor to make her case.
Topics:
Free tagging:
Ad:
Comments
Ya think she's pulling a
Ya think she's pulling a Barnicle?
Voter shenanigans
Registration shenanigans are not in short supply this year.
Indianapolis...
sayanythingblog.com...indianapolis_has_105_of_its_population/
105%. Wow. That's even better than good, it's superb.
Or maybe Slate reads Talking
Or maybe Slate reads Talking Points Memo, which also made the same point and cited the same Barnard professor on Oct. 10.
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/223436.php
In fact, if you do a Google search, you'll notice the Barnard prof has been quoted in more than a dozen articles in the past few weeks about voter fraud. A PR firm even issued a press release touting her as an authority on voter fraud last month. So, it's not exactly shocking that a Globe columnist would quote her, too.
Ayup
I'm just arguing a case of laziness, not Barnicleness.
dunno her sources, but she's fair...
McCain's accusation, if without merit, is the story here. Even if it does have merit, it's the story here.
Why would McCain level a categorical accusation "greatest frauds in voter history" and qualify if with the word "maybe"? Hyperbole. It's irresponsible.
For comparison take this statement: Adam is on the verge of maybe perpetrating one of the greatest pedophile attacks in history, maybe destroying the fabric of the family. It's completely irresponsible, don't you think?
Yvonne Abraham writes:
Yvonne Abraham's assessment of ACORN is a lot more reasoned than John McCain's assessment. McCain doesn't make his case.
Here's Robert F Kennedy Jr. making his case for voter suppression. There's a link to an article he wrote for Rolling Stone that discuss voter suppression techniques used in 2000 and 2004. Kennedy makes a far better case for voter suppression than McCain makes for voting fraud. clip