The Phoenix has another patent; Facebook not first to feel Mindich wrath
In addition to the patent used by Phoenix subsidiary Tele-Publishing, Inc. to sue Facebook this week, the company has a patent (issued in 2000) for a method and apparatus for matching registered profiles.
And in 2005, Tele-Publishing sued several alternative weeklies across the country for allegedly violating both of these patents. The issue never got to a jury because the newspapers, in Washington, Chicago and Sacramento, settled the matter by signing a licensing deal with Tele-Publishing (here's the consent decree).
Here's the abstract:
A system of matching a first user with at least one other user of the system by comparing criteria data of the first user with characteristic data of the at least one other user and criteria data of the at least one other user with characteristic data of the first user. The characteristic and criteria data can be obtained via the Internet, and more specifically through a series of web site screens that prompt the user for characteristic and preference data. The system performs the comparison of the respective characteristic and criteria data to provide a list of matches to the first user. The first user is furnished with information that allows the first user to contact the other users for which a match has been found.
Hmm, sounds just like what happens every time I log into LinkedIn: I get a list of other users whom I might be suited to become best buds with because of where I worked or what interests I have. Or the MySpace search engine that lets you find people like you within 5 miles of your address. And wouldn't that be something to see Team Mindich take on Murdoch?
Still, why didn't the Tele-Publishing cite this patent in its suit against Facebook? Possibly, as more-awake-than-me Ron Newman notes, the patent refers repeatedly to "newspapers," which Facebook obviously isn't.
Oh, the Phoenix has four other patents, but they're written too specifically about serving up personal ads to be used in lawsuits against every social-networking site on earth.
Ad:
Comments
but LinkedIn, MySpace, and Facebook are not newspapers
and this patent refers repeatedly to "newspapers".
Good point
That might explain why they didn't include it in their Facebook suit, since Facebook has ways of matching users to other users based on their interests.
Suing Linux Next?
If Mindich starts complaining about Sith Lords, we know it is time for him to retire to a community with a "special neighborhood for people with memory problems".
This is fun!
Welcome to 1966! Here's your computer dating punch card!
The Phoenix's genius
Ah, but see, they didn't do that through Web pages!
The Phoenix's word choice?
But the information 'can' be obtained over the Internet. I'm having 8th grade English class flashbacks now. It feels ... ambiguous?
considering im in tech and have friends who are patent lawyers
It seems facebook did in fact step over the line.. no big deal businesses do this all the time and they pay for it.. Fb can state its theres if they do not have a patent and from talking to lawyers your talking millions to bring the suit up and a business or firm wouldnt put that cash forward if they didnt have something to stand on. I mean Fb alredy paid out before becuase they screwed over people including th efounder or so called founder since he took the ideas from a class project with others who contributed..
Dammit, I see Fb and it
Dammit, I see Fb and it looks just WRONG to me. Because Fb is technically E, you see.