The women, he said, were not scantily clad - they had tights on
Attorney William Ferullo and his client, Umbria Prime owner Frank DePasquale, however, did allow as how DePasquale failed to notify the Mayor's Office of Consumer Affairs and Licensing about the "theme" night at which the models appeared, as required by the license that licensing chief Patricia Malone reminded them DePasquale signs for every year "under the pains and penalties of perjury."
At issue at a hearing yesterday was a "Wall Street" theme night the pricey downtown steakhouse held on March 24, as well as just what the models were up to as they hung around as part of a promotion for Svedka Vodka that night.
Boston Police Sgt. Det. Robert Mulvey told Malone at a hearing yesterday that he arrived for an unscheduled inspection around 12:50 a.m. to find a gaggle of women clad only in "intimate attire" - which he defined as bras and panties under un-buttoned men's shirts - clustered around a booth posing for photos with male patrons.
But was it a floor show, the likes of which Umbria Prime's entertainment license do not allow? Mulvey agreed with Ferullo the women were neither singing nor dancing. "How do photos make this a floor show?" Ferullo asked. Mulvey replied men were not just going up to have their photos taken - they were also standing around just watching the women - just like you'd do at a show And while the women were not doing acting of the Shakespearean sort, they were acting "kind of seductive," Mulvey said.
Ferullo then attempted to rebut Mulvey's testimony that the women were clad inappropriately. "They had tights on," he said. Malone, however, said their attire was not the main issue - the lack of notification to her about the event and the use of somebody to hire the women and advertise the event were.
Because of past problems with special events at the restaurant, in 2009, Malone amended its entertainment license to require 72 hours notice to her of any "themed" events. DePasquale said he'd faithfully filed such notices for more than two years, never heard any objections about the events and so "I took it after 2 1/2 years that the probationary period was over for good."
Malone said DePasquale, a veteran Boston restaurateur, should know better than that; that if he wants to stop having to file notices, he needs to formally request a change in his license. Ferullo apologized for the oversight and said it would not happen again.
More contentious was the discussion over whether Green T Enterprises of Quincy, which arranged for the women, was a "promoter," which is an issue because Malone does not allow promoters to take over venues for a night.
DePasquale said Green T was not acting as a promoter - they did not take over the restaurant and did not take a cut of the night's receipts as a promoter would. DePasquale said he has a verbal agreement with the company's owner to do social-network marketing and advertising for the restaurant, and that he pays them a set amount for that work.
Malone questioned why DePasquale couldn't handle his own social-media advertising and why he felt the need to pay somebody else for marketing. "Why can't the licensee do his own advertising?" she asked.
DePasquale said nobody in his operation has the skills to properly market events on sites such as Twitter and Facebook. Ferullo said the concept's no different than paying the Globe and Herald for ads - which Umbria Prime also does.
Malone will issue a ruling on the March 24 event within a month.
Ad:
Comments
Why is this an issue?
Sounds more like a waste of time.
OH MY GOD!
They were wearing skimpy outfits and taking pictures with guys? That's definitely "entertainment", The morality police should have shut that place down on the spot and taken axes to their barrels of the devils elixir they were probably serving!
What a complete joke. They had promotional girls in for a vodka company...something almost every bar downtown does, and they were wearing sexy outfits. Oh, the horror.
Any bar with sexy patrons is now an entertainment spot
That seems to be the message here, because the issue wasn't the photos, but that some men were looking at the models. What happens if the bar hires sexy cocktail waitresses? Does that now constitute entertainment? I'll grant it might be entertaining, but that's not the sort of thing that should require licensing.
What if...
The bar just allows scantily clad women enter the bar...and men are entertained? Do they need an entertainment license? Should we create a new "sexy" license that bars have to apply for? Maybe we should just ban bars altogether. People in Boston don't "need" any more bars, or fun!
Why it's an issue? Follow the money?
That is the money paid to Boston Police Sgt. Det. Robert Mulvey and licensing chief Patricia Malone. They have to justify their payroll.
I wonder why Boston is such an expensive city to live in? When I read reports such as this, or notice the many police details which are nothing more than legal extortion, I see the reasons.
Cause of high cost of living?
While things such as these undoubtedly raise the cost of doing business (and thereby, the cost of living as a portion of the expense is passed on), are they really the cause of the relatively high cost of living around here?
(Or is is more that our little outpost on the North Atlantic is a desirable place to live, the economy is pretty good (and there are lots of opportunities in highly remunerated fields available), and that there is not a tremendous appetite for increasing the housing stock?)
Malone does not allow promoters to take over venues for a night
hahahaha. give me a break. I don't know what part of this story is the most ridiculous, but that's funny.
Malone should just drop dead
Or get a real job. Either one.
Patricia Malone sounds like
Patricia Malone sounds like she needs to get laid.
You don't know...
...the half of it when it comes to Patricia Malone. LOL