Hey, there! Log in / Register

Simulated gunfire, explosions will ring out at Fenway as police practice for Orlando-like incident

Boston Police will conduct exercises at Fenway Park today to train on dealing with an "active shooter incident," just hours after a man killed 50 and injured 50 in an Orlando nightclub.

People outside Fenway could hear what sounds like gunfire and explosions - and see drones flying around.

Neighborhoods: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Guns kill a lot more people than bombs, and terrorists seem to be learning this from the Charleston and even Newtown incidents.

up
Voting closed 0

a well, moderately potent bomb can easily kill 50-100 people. In warzones, IEDs the preferred method of killing, and more importantly, maiming the greatest # of casualties as easily as possible. Snipers are mostly effective at tying down as many enemies as possible, forcing resources to be extended on neutralizing the sniper.

All terrorist in urban settings have used bombs as the preferred method of killing and maiming.

up
Voting closed 0

Since it's obvious you are unaware of both of the Paris attacks by terrorists.

up
Voting closed 0

Orlando is even closer then Paris.

up
Voting closed 0

But, it depends on the individual's access to material and training. In the US, access to anfo is severely restricted. Plain ammonia fertilizer, in large amounts, is purchased by farmers and well-known (farming) corporations. If I, as an individual, tried to buy bags of ammonium nitrate fertilizer for my 'lawn', ya, alarm bells would go off.
Still, there's been a lot of bombing/gun staged attacks. I think the greatest threat to safety is the utter lack of 'good guy' shooters on scene. The attack in Texas (draw you-know-who) resulted in the death of the shooters by a police officer on the scene.

An incomplete list:

Oklahoma City: Huge bomb, ammonium nitrate/fuel oil (ANFO). Total horror show, military trained perpetrator.
San Bernardino terror attack 16 Guns.
Tel Aviv terror attack 4 Guns
Paris, 130 a series of bombings and coordinated shootings
Fort Hood 13 Gun. (Was there a flash grenade involved?)
Chattanooga 4 Gun.
Little Rock 2009 1 dead 1 wounded. Gun.
Washington Navy Yard 12 Gun.
Norway 77 (bomb, then gunfire attack)

The Paris attacks illustrate your point. It was well-coordinated and effective. An attack like that against non-military targets is just wholesale slaughter.

Many of the other attacks involved a gun versus non-armed people. The military base/recruitment shootings were against essentially civilian targets. Face it, in the Ft. Hood shooting, most of the victims were attacking the perpetrator with shit like chairs and tables.

The Florida attack is horrible. If there were more pistols in the hands of the good guys, somebody would have gotten to him. Hell, Florida is a 'stand your ground' state. But, the club does have the right to set its own gun policy.

Maybe, just maybe, we can actually have a conversation about the proper defensive uses of weapons in a situation like this.

up
Voting closed 0

Belgian attacks, dozens killed, acetone based bombs.

up
Voting closed 0

If there were more pistols in the hands of the good guys, somebody would have gotten to him.

In a dark room, figure out who the shooter is, and hit them and nobody else?

I'm not the only one who thinks that this is pure fantasy. The FBI thinks that it is pure fantasy, based on the evidence: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-weisser/fbi-report-active-shooters_b_...

Here’s how these incidents ended. More than half (56 percent) were terminated by the shooter who either took his or her own life, simply stopped shooting or fled the scene. Another 26 percent ended in the traditional Hollywood-like fashion with the shooter and law enforcement personnel exchanging gunfire and in nearly all of those situations the shooter ended up either wounded or dead. In 13 percent of the shooting situations, the shooter was successfully disarmed and restrained by unarmed civilians, and in 3 percent of the incidents the shooter was confronted by armed civilians, of whom four were on-duty security guards and one person was just your average “good guy” who happened to be carrying a gun.

And:

The FBI report not only debunks the “good guy stops the bad guy” nonsense, but also gives us some important data to judge the validity of another NRA mantra, namely, whether “bad guys” are drawn to commit shootings in gun-free zones.

There were "good guys with guns" present at a number of shootings, and they were unable to shoot or stop the shooter due to the chaos.

In short: rhetoric and theory sound nice, but the evidence simply does not bear out the theory.

up
Voting closed 0

Because we live in Crazy Land, I guess this probably is a controversial statement, but: bombs and guns are both bad. That's my hot take for today.

up
Voting closed 0

Dr., not Ms.

Please check the comparative statistics for bombings and shootings in the US for more information.

up
Voting closed 0

What about the Boston marathon bombing?

up
Voting closed 0

They had home made 'grenades' with them after the original bombings. Three dead in the bombings, with over 200 serious maimings.

What if they placed the backpacks on top of traffic light controls or mailboxes or something?

up
Voting closed 0

Had the two bombers instead done a Paris-style open fire on the crowd, the death toll would have been far higher.

up
Voting closed 0

And had the two bombers instead done an Oklahoma City-type bomb, the death toll could have exceeded that of every mass shooting of the 21st century put together.

up
Voting closed 0

I'd hazard a guess that active shooter/ hostage scenarios can be trained for more effectively than bomb scenarios.

Large joint operations can use the coordinated training.

up
Voting closed 0

up
Voting closed 0