Hey, there! Log in / Register

New Acela trains could be late

WTOP in Washington reports an audit has found a good chance that the 28 new trains Amtrak was planning to begin rolling out next year could arrive late due to both manufacturing and management issues; delays could mean significant losses because the new trains can carry more passengers.

Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

In America's proud tradition of excellent, well managed, and widely supported public transportation this is perhaps the first time a new equipment deadline has slipped.

I feel sorry for the top brass at Amtrak for this is a day of reckoning. Surely the CEO of Amtrak and the train manufacturer will both resign in embarrassment before their boards have a chance to force them out.

Despite being tasked with serving the public -- which means that it serves low-use routes necessary to provide connectivity and it serves customers who aren't able to drive, fly, or sometimes even go by bus (think: mechanical wheelchairs that don't fit in a coach bus).

The Northeast corridor (Acela) is killing it. It needs more capacity to serve even more people. And, let's get real, we need an Acela South to go DC - Richmond - Raleigh - Greensboro - Charlotte - Greenville - Atlanta.

I recently rode the route you’re describing (Amtrak Crescent, all the way to New Orleans), and parts of it are much, much slower than the Northeast Corridor. Many areas shared w/freight trains.

America _does_ have a proud tradition of excellent, well managed, and widely supported public transportation. It's just that this tradition stopped in 1950 or so.

What's good for General Motors is good for America!

You're saying we did have a tradition. We don't have it anymore.

This wouldn't have happened if Hunter Biden had stayed aboard the Amtrak Board.

Tucker Carlson's outfit - highly reputable propaganda!

As someone so intently against nepotism, you must hate all the Trump crime family members in the White House.

If the existing Acelas weren't custom one-off oddities, they could add seats by just coupling a few more standard cars to the existing tiny trains. No $3 billion replacement of a fleet that's only 20 years old would be needed.

Instead we're doubling down on the overpriced unproven custom nonsense.