Hey, there! Log in / Register
Explosions, fire on an Orange Line train on bridge over Mystic River; passengers kick out windows to escape
By adamg on Thu, 07/21/2022 - 8:03am
As passengers stand on bridge, train keeps smoking. Photo by Jay Bernard.
Update: MBTA says metal strip came loose from train and then into contact with the third rail.
The first car of an older inbound Orange Line train suffered an explosion, then burst into flames on the bridge over the Mystic River just before Assembly this morning, sending panicked riders onto the bridge while the third rail was still live. One rider jumped into the river; came out OK.
Jennifer Thomson-Sullivan, who was in the first car and who took video of the escape around 6:45 a.m., reports:
Explosions on first car followed by flames surrounding the car. People freaked, flames started engulfing and moving toward us. Emergency exit wouldn’t open so guy next to me kicked out window. People started jumping out, not even considering active third rail.
Breaking: Fire Crews on scene of Orange line train fire. #boston25 https://t.co/XvIFJB3dI1 pic.twitter.com/n5tcIlQA6e
— Ted Daniel (@tvnewzted) July 21, 2022
Might be longer than 15 minutes.. @universalhub @NBC10Boston @WCVB pic.twitter.com/WD5FbEqNHx
— Jay Bernard (@Jacobus52999) July 21, 2022
Nick Andreucci was on the first train car when the fire broke out on the Orange line train. *LISTEN*
“It’s shocking, but not shocking at the same time… “It’s awful, but it’s kind of our daily life in Boston taking the train I guess.” #7news pic.twitter.com/F4Lbi2YKZw— Amaka Ubaka (@AmakaUbakaTV) July 21, 2022
#MBTA Orange line trains from Forest Hills are packed like a can of sardines and standing by due to the train that caught fire at Assembly. Uber/Lyft prices are up, too. Allow extra time this morning, folks. @universalhub pic.twitter.com/Pes9RCZmGq
— Emily (@holdentheworld) July 21, 2022
Neighborhoods:
Topics:
Free tagging:
Ad:
Support Universal Hub
Help keep Universal Hub going. If you like what we're up to and want to help out, please consider a (completely non-deductible) contribution.
Comments
Train moved into Wellington maintenance yard
When do the old cars get pulled for inspection?
After they explode and burst into flames ...
Photo of the train in the Wellington yard.
That doesn't look
significantly different from any other Orange Line car in service.
Heckuva job, Charlie!
I’m so glad Baker “fixed” the T.
Time for another task force to study the problem.
Or maybe a special commission this time.
What would also help...
...is moving more operating funds to the capital budget.
At this point, we're having what, about one serious safety incident a week? We're in uncharted territory but how long before the Feds issue some order that renders a whole line (or the whole system) completely shut down. Feel like it's coming.
Are you being ironic?
Moving operating funds to capitol was one of the things the FTA dinged the T for.
As the Legislature carves up $4 Billion in Federal Money
for their collective pet projects, ideas, and pork, they should be investing in this critical infrastructure. If economic development and recovery are the objectives, then help out the majority of T riders who have no alternative. The same people will be paying $5 per gallon for heating oil in another 8 weeks. Perhaps there could have been some money set aside for fuel assistance.
Maybe
The legislature will hold a hearing!
Fire Beverly Scott!
Cuz it's not Charlie's fault !
Bev Scott got a raw deal
They basically blamed her for a once in 100 years weather event, and all the things that have subsequently gone wrong on Charlie's watch prove the point that it's the chronic lack of support from the Commonwealth that has brought us to this.
Was that ever his intention?
Doesn’t seem like he ever even tried. From my perspective his actions look a lot more like he was trying to create a justification for privatization through deliberate mismanagement and under funding, which is a well established tactic of neoliberalism.
What do you mean by privatize and neoliberalism?
Nobody, and I mean nobody outside of a few crazed libertarian think tanks believes in privatized public transit. What is Baker's plan for a private MBTA, and how is it to be funded?
As for neoliberalism, do you know what that even means? Hint: it has nothing to do with regional transportation planning.
As for neoliberalism, do you
Do you? It's got everything to do with privatization, deregulation, and "free markets."
"nobody outside of a few
"nobody outside of a few crazed libertarian think tanks"
I have some potentially interesting news for you about MBTA GM Steve Poftak's previous gig...........
God save the T
Because it is going off a fiscal cliff and will never be able to reach pre-pandemic ridership levels because of fires, crime, delays, no fare enforcement and a surge of anti-social behavior.
Fare enforcement
Freeing the T should end all fare evasion and budget issues.
Oh hey
While they're at it, how about world peace and an end to the climate crisis? Also, some decent food in T stations. Dunks sucks.
I was being
Sarcastic. Well aware Wu’s magic money tree is really everyone elses bank account.
Yes, god forbid.
Heaven forbid you to pay $2.00 more a year so that everyone, including you, can use a fully-functional subway and bus system without having to pay money at the time of boarding.
$2 per resident
Still amounts to a lot less than what fares bring in each year.
But sure, we'll increase direct state aid to the T by $14 million and somehow try to figure out how to make the T run safely and frequently without that additional $250 or so million dollars that riders pay in fares. It will work out great, no?
$2/yr
$2/yr was not a CPA calculation to go fare-free.
Again, you don't need as much revenue if you also don't have to pay to collect revenue and police people paying revenue, etc. So, it's not just a matter of "amounting to what fares bring in each year".
But whatever the averaged costs over all taxpayers in the state, it doesn't amount to anything meaningful...which is what the "$2" I used was meant to represent, not the exact pre-destined number that would actually happen.
It's the same thing with healthcare. You don't just add up how much America pays for healthcare and say "well, divide that by all the taxpayers and you'd have to raise my taxes like $100,000 dollars a year!". Properties of scale, reduced costs, etc.
We've discussed this
They are not spending $250 million (btw, the actual fare numbers are higher, but I didn't want to get bogged down in that) on fare collection only to get $2 per resident a year's worth of revenue.
As I've been saying for as long as my prominent neighbor has been proposing it, show me a practical plan to fund the T without a third of it's current revenue, and I'll support it. Until then, people are asking for the T to do more with a lot less, which is a recipe for disaster.
Exactly
Part of what this crisis shows is that fares are not an adequate funding mechanism for essential services. Fare should be eliminated, and a funding instead coming from taxes either on the most fossil fuel intensive forms of transit, on the biggest polluters, and/or on the wealthy in general.
Not sure that fixes the problem
The current funding mechanism is: fares + 20% of sales tax + any supplemental appropriation = MBTA budget
Your statement relies on the idea that the legislature would fully fund a properly sized budget. But they already aren't willing to do that. What makes you think they'd do it if fares were eliminated? The only real solution for achieving more transit funding is better and more persistent advocacy.
Corporations/Institutions should fund the T
Corporations/institutions benefit the most from public transport.
It’s the T that delivers both their workforce and their clientele to their front doors. Fidelity, Dunkin, every hospital, every university, Boston Garden, the Red Sox, Legal Sea Foods…you name it.
Ditch the new $1 billion fare collection system and use those who benefit the most from the T to fund the system.
"the T is safe"
Charlie Baker 6-3-22
Billy Joel says
he didn't start it.
Billy has done some damage before though...
Especially to shrubs when drunk driving
Imagine a parallel universe
Where buildings are falling down, MBTA trains are blowing up, and we're still going ahead and getting ready to host the Olympics...I need a drink
Awesome
Smoooke on the waaterr
Old OL cars
It's evident to anyone with eyes that the T could not be bothered maintaining the old cars since the pandemic started. They're now regularly running trains with entire cars disabled for various reasons and the trains just look unsafe. Lucky riders get to choose between exploding batteries in the new trains and trains that temporarily break down between stations and catch fire I guess.
They now tout the new cars on the OL….
…in arrival announcements: “The next train to Forest Hills is now arriving with new Orange Line cars!”
slow to cut power
Judging from the way the fire flares up in the video, the train was still electrified after Gosselin started recording. How long does it take the MBTA to turn off the power, assuming the driver promptly reported it to dispatch?
You do realize that windows
You do realize that windows are emergency exits on trains?
Ride the T they say
To state the obvious, this is going to do nothing to improve ridership on the T. Who wants to take the risk?
Riding transit is safer than driving
Even with all these high profile accidents riding the T is not as safe as it should be but it is still far safer than driving. And as the article I linked asks What if We Held Transit and Traffic to the Same Safety Standards? Cars catch on fire all the time in metro Boston, they also kill far more pedestrians (and people driving cars), and cause a lot more injury. For some reason it is hardly ever reported on in a similar way, dangerous roads aren’t immediately shut down or highly limited for redesigns (when they are redesigned it usually drags on for years), cars which are statistically more likely to kill are not recalled and forced to be redesigned.
To be clear I am not saying the T doesn’t need to get its act together, it clearly fucking does. But the risk is not higher on the T than in a car.
T is safer than driving
The T is still safer than driving. facts over feelings.
Facts over feelings
So you are telling me for a fact this will have no affect on T ridership?
And the risk I mentioned is not safety, but actually getting to your location in a reasonably amount of time. No one was injured in today's incident, but 100% of the people on the train were late to their destination.
Oh look
It's so-you-are-telling-me person!
They said nothing remotely like that. Please, sweep up your straw.
That was my original argument
Now it is a strawman?
Look it up
This was your response to a statement that did not say, "for a fact" or any other way, that "this will have no affect on T ridership". That's a strawman. Look it up.
Omg, dude
You’re exhausting
Omg, dude
You're a lightweight.
Leader in the clubhouse for quote of the day
“It’s shocking, but not shocking at the same time… “It’s awful, but it’s kind of our daily life in Boston taking the train I guess.”
It wasn't necessary to jump from windows onto the tracks
Let alone jump into the river. Just walk through the other cars that weren't exploding or in fire down to the last.
Of course ...
It's easy to say not being on a train car where you've just heard explosions and the car starts to fill with smoke and all.
The incident looks like it
The incident looks like it might be like the train fire a few years ago north of Wellington. In that incident, a metal sign got caught between the third-rail shoe on the car and the third-rail. That caused an electrical short, which in turn set the wooden beam the third-rail shoe is mounted to on fire. The heat from that then caused the air bag (the air suspension) to explode, resulting in a ball of fire (like pricking a balloon with a match). Luckily, even the older cars are made from fire resistent material, so once the oxygen from the air bag is released in a fire ball, it will burn out the rubber air bag (which causes the heavy black smoke) but won't spread into the interior of the car. But obviously, the average person is not going to know all that and will want to escape as soon as possible.
Reading comprehension, much?
The quote from one of the evacuees was that the emergency exit wouldn't open, and flames started moving into in the car.
In a sane universe, these doors would be tested weekly (the doors between trains); it's a simple inspector walking through the train, from front cab to rear, opening each door, passing through, and closing. On a schedule. One guy, one hour, every morning, walking through trains, and tagging those on today's schedule that need the doors fixed before they're dispatched. And maybe, at the end of their shift, repeating the walkthrough to test the repaired trains.
But in a sane universe, maintenance is not a dirty word. Don't you LOVE living in Bizarro Universe?
The MBTA actually testing doors?
What heresy is this?
Not heresy, really
My dad was an inspector for an airline (holding all the licenses, A, P, A&P). His job was to be the first guy in and last guy out of a plane in for overhaul, or for the section (later, specifically, widebody powerplants) of a plane his overhaul crew was responsible for.
Line inspectors do this at airports during turnarounds. Check all the orifices to see if they open/close like they're supposed to. Often just peering over the shoulders of the line crew refueling, checking the hydraulics and the tires, etc. The guy with the clipboard (nowadays, tablet).
It was a union job, and note, the planes didn't fall out of the sky. And they still don't, which tells you this kind of scheduled check works.
This is not a stupid suggestion; I suspect the Feds are going to require hiring inspectors to do this damn job.
Oh, I know it's a good idea.
Which is why they won't do it.
To be fair
Considering the frequency with which those emergency doors used to fly open mid ride, I also would have never expected one of them to be stuck.
That would be the perfect union job
The worker assigned to check doors would just lay down on a seat and take a nap for an hour instead.
Question for the legal brain trust:
Can passengers on exploding train cars sue the T?
Person jumped into the river
https://twitter.com/robwaytv/status/1550099797201371136?s=21&t=eykDPeSkY...
Per @RobWayTV
it gets comical
From the Globe
Refused or declined?
Maybe she's a good swimmer. Or even an average one; she was only about 200 feet from shore, at most. Maybe she didn't want to make a big deal out of it. If it was me, I would have done the same thing. But then, I'm male, so I could hope that people would think I was being rugged and manly, not hysterical.
Can't blame her
I might be in a "to hell with vehicles" mood at that moment too.
What the hell is happening?
It's like there is no one in charge of the MBTA. You'd think after a series of embarrassing stories, something would change. Technically something did change, just for the worse.
Yeah, they need to put
Yeah, they need to put someone in charge who can lay down the law and tell these old trains, “Hey, no fires before you’re scrapped!”
"It's like there is no one in charge of the MBTA"
In case you haven't noticed, there doesn't seem to be anyone much in charge of ANYTHING anymore. And the ones that are have completely risen to the level of their incompetence.
Small Correction?
According to the Globe it was a woman who jumped into the Mystic.
(and you’re welcome for the Van Morrison earworm).
Fiddle music plays ...