Local bar owner denied permission to buy closed Allston pub for lying about his criminal record
The Boston Licensing Board today rejected a proposal by Derek Brady, who owns six restaurants and bars in Boston, to buy the closed White Horse Tavern on Brighton Avenue in Allston, because his application included a statement he had no criminal record when, in fact, he does.
Board members also dinged Brady, a Wellesley resident who had proposed buying the tavern and its liquor license from Allston/Brighton restaurant owner Douglas Bacon, for failing to adequately discuss why the state Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission suspended the license for one of his bars for 100 days and fined him $73,000 in 2012 - also for not disclosing he had a record.
Board Chairwoman Kathleen Joyce said Brady's criminal record, which he mostly racked up in the 1990s, is old enough that it would not have bothered her had Brady admitted to it, rather than checking off a box, under "pains and penalties of perjury" that he had no criminal record.
She said he also wasn't honest during a July 27 public hearing on the White Horse Tavern application when he was asked why the state Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission suspended another one of his licenses in 2012, for a sushi place in Cambridge, at first "indefinitely" and then for 90 days.
Brady told the board it was because his corporation's request to open the restaurant "didn't have some information on there that they needed regarding my personal information and that's why they cited that." In fact, the "personal information" was that he had checked boxes averring he had no criminal record on his application for that transaction as well.
"He lied or he has not been honest in his application before us," Joyce said. "It would have been satisfactory if he had checked yes and explained."
Board members Liam Curran and Keeana Saxon agreed. Saxon said that in the eight years she's been on the board, members have "always appreciated candor and honesty" and that her vote was the "natural consequence of not being honest."
Joyce did not detail Brady's criminal record, but the ABCC, in a separate 2012 ruling rejecting his request to buy and re-open a closed bar on Causeway Street, did - and said Brady had lied repeatedly, for years, about that record, which includes seven convictions in several Massachusetts counties and even a brief jail sentence, on charges that ranged from larceny to assault. The last of the convictions was in 1998, but the commission noted an arrest warrant out of Boston Municipal Court for Brady on an unspecified charge in 2011.
At an ABCC hearing on the Causeway Street license request, Brady said he had simply forgotten he had ever been convicted of anything, let alone spent time in jail, an assertion the ABCC didn't buy:
The Commission is incredulous that an individual who has seven entries on his criminal record, which all resulted in convictions, claims to have forgotten about these criminal activities. Mr. Brady was arrested on numerous occasions, placed on probation several times, received a suspended jail sentence, and was actually committed to the house of correction for one of the offenses. The Commission does not find Mr. Brady's testimony credible, and believes he intentionally attempted to deceive this commission on three separate applications since 2006.
The commission then cited its Causeway Street ruling in its rulings on the Cambridge sushi place - the liquor-license application for which, it said, Brady had again checked "no" on questions about any past arrests or convictions.
The licensing board today denied Brady's request to buy the White Horse Tavern with prejudice, which means he has to wait at least a year to try again.
July 27 licensing-board hearing on Brady's application to buy the White Horse Tavern and its liquor license:
Ad:
Comments
I mean, who among us has not
I mean, who among us has not had multiple criminal convictions and a short stay in the hotel entirely slip their mind.
“It was an honest mistake!!!”
“When you said ‘criminal convictions’ I thought you meant ‘criminal beliefs’ or ‘criminal principles,’ so I said no.”
“What about when we said ‘charged with a crime’?”
“I thought to myself ‘hmm, I can be charged with static electricity when I walk on a rug, but I don’t see how anyone can be charged with a crime, the very concept is nonsensical.’ I had simply forgotten the other definition of ‘charge’. A completely understandable mistake.”
I forgot!
I completely forgot that spending time in prison means I was convicted of a crime! So excuuuuse me!
Good to see someone with
Good to see someone with money being held accountable for a change, there are enough bars in the world spreading misery, have a little creativity!
glad to see
zero tolerance for those acting in bad faith, and a punishment (waiting a year) he can't buy his way out of -- too bad this doesn't extend to more areas of government. If anything it should probably be more like a 5-10 year ban.
It seems like what they really need to enforce
Is the “under pain and penalties of perjury” part. Maybe I am misunderstanding what “perjury” means in this context, but it sounds like he committed a serious crime.
“Wait a year and try again” doesn’t sound like “zero tolerance” to me. Zero tolerance would be contacting the DA.
own goal
All this guy had to do was check a box. He didn't check the box because he didn't want to answer the question publicly even when the simple answer can always be (considering the crimes happened in his 20s), "I was young and dumb with anger and I've gotten counseling with that and changed my life around to doing what I love: food and hospitality".
What an own goal. btw look this guy on FB; he posts anti-vax stuff lmao I mean you can have your opinion on it, but if you open public businesses, esp restaurants, the less said has value esp in today's climate.
OK, you were a jerk...but wait you still are!
I can accept that he was once a real jerk and has turned himself around. But to come to the hearing and lie to their faces, tells me he's still a jerk and shouldn't be allowed the privilege of opening another bar.
Entirely possible..
When not assaulting others, he assaults himself and therefore has no recall?
Two peanuts were walking down the street, one was a salted.
When did the White Horse officially die?
Pre-COVID, that place always seemed to be hopping. I see a mention on 12/24/20 on uHub that they were closing for the winter. Did they just never reopen? Just curious...
Yes
They reopened, but never gained much momentum. Tavern (refuse to use itS unfortunate acronym) has installed an insanely loud sound system and has stolen much of the Th-Sat night-life around Allston.
I assume that the "Tavern"
I assume that the "Tavern" with an "unfortunate acronym" is yet another instance of Tavern On The Square. For when what you really want is TGI Friday's, but you also want to shop local.
I did used to stop at the Central Square one for the fried pickles sometimes, though. That's how they get you.
It officially died
When the owner chose the word of a con man over his competent employees in 2011, then fired the con man for skimming money off of him.
Everyone sucks except for me.
I dont know..
I dont know that a white horse would even work in Allston any more. It was a "white hat" bar forever, but what sports "bros" even hang out in little korea anymore? Probably best to turn this into a boba tea spot or something.
Oof. And the uhub seal of
Oof. And the uhub seal of disapproval.
I hope no one in Swellesley reads the Hub
Derek will be sol if he tries to borrow the Grey Poupon
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwOCOm9Z0YE
so what are the pains and penalties?
So, what are the pains and penalties for lying on that paperwork?
The penalty is the pain
from being whacked on the head with the penal codes.
There are criminals without a
There are criminals without a record.
An interesting thing I've
An interesting thing I've heard is that criminologists are aware of a serious problem in their field: as a rule, if a person commits a crime, they are motivated to keep it secret. (Yes, there are lots of important exceptions, but speaking very generally here.) As a result, most of the criminals available for them to study are people who aren't especially good at crime. There could be any number of crooked but more intelligent people getting away with--in some cases literally--murder.
Lying liars who lie
If it was one conviction as a kid, sure. Who *hasn't* been convicted and then let off on community service for dropping a watermelon on an ice cream truck from three stories up? Hypothetically.
Seven conviction and jail time... no, you don't forget that, even after a couple decades. You might not want to admit it, you might not choose to bring it up if you don't have to since it was an embarrassing chapter of your life and you're a different person now... but it's pretty hard to believe you could actually forget it.
And claiming to forget after having previously been fined $73,000 for lying about the exact same thing?
Nah, man. Get a new hobby.
The last word
1) I have a long-running relationship with Derek Brady, having known him personally since 2005. I've hosted trivia in three of his establishments: O Sushi, Causeway, and The Draft.
My presentation of trivia was not the long-running success in his venues that I enjoyed previously at other bars in Boston, but nonetheless, Derek has always been friendly towards me, and is generally a genial person. In fact, I spoke with him on my final night as a Bostonian back at the end of March before I moved back to Vermont.
2) It appears that the overriding sentiment among the commenters in this thread is that people should not lie, and that Derek deserves both the result that he got from the Licensing Board for having done so, and the ensuing schadenfreude. I can't justifiably, and thus won't, argue against anyone who would decry someone for being a liar.
All I can hope for is that when government inevitably impacts them negatively by lying, they respond with the same scorn that they applied to Derek.
Seriously, I'd like to see the bar for siding with unelected government sociopaths over a private citizen be a little bit higher than "This guy omitted information from a form."
3) I really can't think of a Bostonian who's a more complete piece of disingenuous garbage than Keanna Saxon. "The natural consequence of not being honest."
Coastal erosion is a natural consequence, Keanna. Your participation in this sham of a government job is entirely voluntary.
She blocked me on her Facebook after I said to her "Keep telling yourself that you're any kind of Bostonian, or even any kind of moral person." What an absolutely gutless, unaccountable embarrassment to public service, the entire trio.
I really wish Boston wasn't so obnoxious at this point. I honestly liked the place when I lived there.
Sorry
Actively, deliberately checking a box - repeatedly - is not an omission. I get that you don't like the appointed official, and that the restaurateur was pleasant to you, but that's not an oversight.
Will
The guy lied. He said "no" when the answer was "yes," on a legal document, and it's at least the 3rd time he's done it. That's not some accident or misunderstanding of the question being asked, it's deliberate. There is a price to pay for dishonesty.
I can't speak for anyone else on here but I'll gladly hold the same scorn for the next guy who repeatedly tells the same lie in a legal document, that's really not a hard line for me to hold.
Since when is honesty a
Since when is honesty a requirement for operating a business (private or government) in Boston?
Those pesky checkboxes
That ask whether you've been charged with or convicted of a crime have been on liquor-license applications for a long time.