Hey, there! Log in / Register

Feds charge some Massachusetts liquor-store and market robberies this year were actually part of an elaborate immigration scheme; two arrested

The US Attorney's office in Boston charges two men figured out how to profit from a visa program available to non-citizens who are victims of certain violent crimes and then help police: Stage gunpoint robberies at their workplaces and then have them tell police they were robbed.

Unfortunately for Rambhai Patel, 36, and Balwinder Singh, 39, the plan worked too well. After police in Massachusetts and other states compared notes and realized one guy seemed to be holding up a lot of stores, the FBI came in and quickly found evidence not only linking the two to the robberies but that something was afoot beyond some guy flying around the country just to rob convenience stores at $200 or so a pop, according to an affidavit by an FBI agent on the case:

For example, toll records analysis showed that some purported victims of the supposed robberies were in contact with PATEL before the robberies. Also, investigation revealed that one of the individuals tasked with committing the robberies had traveled via airplane to commit a robbery in circumstances where the money likely to be obtained during the robbery could reasonably be expected to have been less than the cost of the travel to commit the robbery. The FBI also learned about immigration-related activity of several store employees following their purported victimization during the robberies. As a result of these unusual factors, during the course of the investigation, the FBI began to suspect that the SUBJECT PERSONS and co-conspirators, both known and unknown, were engaged in a visa fraud scheme, rather than a series of Hobbs Act robberies.

Patel allegedly hatched the plan to offer people who wanted to stay in the US access to "U visas," meant for "victims of certain crimes who have suffered mental or physical abuse and who have been helpful to law enforcement in the investigation or prosecution of criminal activity."

After the "robberies," which Patel would allegedly set up after ensuring no customers were in the shops, the affidavit states, victims would talk to local police detectives, then go back to the police to ask them to fill out the 918-B form required for them to get one of these visas.

According to the affidavit, a co-conspirator who agreed to cooperate with the FBI told agents the "victims" paid Patel $10,000 apiece for his services. The amount was not, however, pure profit: Patel paid the "gunman" in each case $1,500 and also made payments of $1,500 to $2,000 to the alleged victim's employers to allow the "robberies" to take place. Singh, meanwhile, got only $500 per "robbery" to act as Patel's get-away driver.

The affidavit describes a Nov. 15 phone call between Patel, the co-conspirator and an FBI agent acting as somebody whom the co-conspirator told Patel was willing to play robber in the scheme. The agent got Patel to describe what would happen:

PATEL: Just you will go inside, I will let you know what time you need to go, like, like, give exact times, and stuff like that, so it's no one inside in the store, the store is empty, there's a guy, like two guys inside, just so, and like hands up, give me money, and just you know come back from that, nothing else.

UCE: You say I say that to a guy, are these guys like your people? Like you know these people?

PATEL: Uh, I know that peoples, but you know the customers, whenever the customer doesn't have in the store, that time you can go inside ...

UCE: Ok, now now how does it go down? Do I got to hop the counter, do I need to pull the gun out, what do you need me to do?

PATEL: Just show the gun, that's it, just [unintelligible] hands up, just you know, just take it up from the register, the money, and just give it to me, that's it. ...

UCE: So you sure they don't call the police, man? This shit sound a little too good to be true, man. You know what I mean, like, are you sure?

PATEL: Yeah, he can call like after fifteen minutes, don't worry.

UCE: And, and what about for, like how I look and shit, they're not going to tell how I look or nothing close to how I look, how does that work?

PATEL: No, they, they, they doesn't tell, don't worry.

Among the stores "robbed" in the scheme according to the affidavit: Richdale Food Shops in Hingham on March 22, Michael's Wine & Spirits in Weymouth on June 6, Yogi's Liquors in Marshfield on June 9 and Jimmy's Market & Liquors in Randolph on Sept. 11.

Both Patel and Singh face one count each of conspiracy to commit visa fraud. Both men were arrested Dec. 13 - Patel in Seattle and Singh in Queens. If convicted, they face up to five years in federal prison.

Innocent, etc.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon Complete affidavit554.66 KB


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Seems like a pretty ingenious plan, only foiled by some pretty ingenious law enforcement.

up
Voting closed 3

These guys are smart. While in prison after convicted they should put them to work tracking down other visa fraudsters. Then after their sentence maybe they can have them work with law enforcement to do some good and they can catch more bad guys.

Imagine if criminals used their brains for good what would be possible ?!

Our immigration system is similar to the rest of our government so politicized and barely functions. Congress passed only 27 laws this past year....we are the ones getting screwed !

Maybe these guys can help to investigate congress, so much shenanigans happening there!

https://www.npr.org/2023/12/29/1222245114/congress-wasnt-very-productive...

up
Voting closed 2

I forget which character was arrested, but there's one bust where the cop calls the guy out, saying "You drove six hours to New York, and you were there for 20 minutes."

As for the crime itself, if we didn't have borders, we wouldn't have visa fraud. Remember, kids: This country had the guy who blew up the Boston Marathon on a watch list, he left voluntarily, and then he got back in. Your government is incapable of keeping people it doesn't want here out anyway, no matter how high you want to or can build a wall.

up
Voting closed 7

Without a border you do not have a nation

up
Voting closed 5

plenty of historians, sociologists, economists, political scientists, etc would disagree with you there.

without borders you don't have a state, but a nation is an entirely different thing.

up
Voting closed 3

A nation is a state. It’s a group of people with a common identity and common set of beliefs. Those ideals don’t have to be stringent they can exist on a spectrum. For example the belief of life liberty and property.

up
Voting closed 2

Before 1924, our nation's immigration policy was "If you get yourself here, welcome to America!" Not only did our nation exist before then, it owes its current character to that policy.

up
Voting closed 2

*Unless you were Asian or African or other insufficiently melanin-challenged sort of person.

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/28/opinion/race-immigration-racism.html

up
Voting closed 2

Before 1924, our nation's immigration policy was "If you get yourself here, welcome to America!"

Nope. Try again.
Are you simply ignorant of history or knowingly trying to distort it?

In a lot of cases, it was "... get yourself here, and there is somebody already here to support you, and you don't have any undesirable health problems... Welcome to America"

Not saying there weren't plenty of problems with that system, but if you're going to point to something as a benchmark, you really need to be starting with the truth.

up
Voting closed 2

Then we are counting everyone government stopped someone as a point for them. It's more than two.

Also you said we should let stalkers and any other type of criminal to be allowed in with no attempt to stop them. How is that better?

Sounds like you're even less capable.

up
Voting closed 5

Also you said we should let stalkers and any other type of criminal to be allowed in with no attempt to stop them. How is that better?

Would it be better if we stopped every vehicle traveling into Massachusetts from, say, Maine or Connecticut, just to make sure there aren't any criminals aboard?

up
Voting closed 0

"Where does it stop, where do you dare me to draw the line?" - Daryl Hall

up
Voting closed 4

That's a very basic logical fallacy, which wouldn't apply in any other scenario or workplace.

They let the Boston marathon bombers in because it was before the bombing.

Being on a watchlist is being different than being on a wanted list. If they don't have robust evidence you did anything, there's no process for getting cleared? Just get automatically denied because you might do something they haven't proved yet?

They are large and sweeping because crystal balls don't exist. So, what was the evidence that put him on the list? It totally matters.

up
Voting closed 4

But, I think we can all agree that it should try and help more than it harms.

I can see a lot of evidence that current immigration policy is harming a lot of people - heck, I'd even include this story as an example of that - but I haven't seen much that indicates that it's actually helpful for anyone, other than maybe the business owners who get to underpay illegal immigrants or the xenophobes who get to have easy scapegoats every election season.

up
Voting closed 2

They either crossed a border or are operating inside a country that has jurisdiction over everywhere they have been.

up
Voting closed 3

No one is saying "laws just shouldn't apply anymore" - the United States would still have jurisdiction and the ability to enforce its laws, the same way that Massachusetts can still have laws and jurisdiction over people traveling from Maine.

So again, I put it to you - why is it necessary for us to have a strong and strict border between, say, Vermont and Quebec, but not Vermont and Massachusetts? Why shouldn't we put up a wall and check passports etc in case those IPA-swilling maple syrup lovers try to swarm our northern border?

up
Voting closed 2

I just think that just because a person was given a work visa, and did a crime later, isn't proof that particular element is bad.

I don't think your example is the same though because there are bodies that could investigate VT and MA, but not VT and Canada.

Also the country has different policies and culture. It's not just two cops in New England.

up
Voting closed 2

Massachusetts has about 7 million people. Massachusetts taxpayers offer a certain level of benefits to their fellow Massachusetts residents who are suffering economic or medical misfortune. There are at least 2 billion people on earth, suffering from levels of economic and medical misfortune that dwarf annything annyone here is experiencing, in a way that you and I could scarcely imagine. How do you propose we pay for extending to them the level of benefits we currently offer to our neighbors?

up
Voting closed 1

Your government is incapable of keeping people it doesn't want here out anyway,

True, if by “incapable” you mean “not as good as it ideally ought to be.”

You are obviously an intelligent adult who reads and thinks. Argument structure that a middle school debate coach would flunk isn’t a good look on you.

up
Voting closed 2

As for Tamerlan Tsarnaev, he was a US permanent resident. You can't exclude permanent residents without a lot of evidence: a report of dubious associations from a foreign (Russian) police agency isn't enough. Obviously such reporting could be abused by foreign governments.

Immigration fraud is rampant. So many categories of admissibility put in by well-meaning activists and members of Congress. Labor certification fraud and special immigrant categories and asylum.

People claim to have arcane skills for employers who are helping them. People claim to be gay. People claim to have been raped. People claim to have been political activists who were tortured. Fake marriages.

I don't care. Until the system is reformed, these are "white lies" for the most part. Good people who want a chance at life.

They should build the wall on the southern border, though. It's unsustainable to allow a tide of migrants of unknown background flowing into the USA seeking casual work.

At the same time the system is a slow, expensive process for legal immigrants. It all needs to be fixed.

up
Voting closed 3

Chrissakes, you were actually making winning points until you decided, without provocation, to eschew awareness.

There's a laser, a dedicated patrol, and five military branches. If we don't want you in, it's not happening. The problem isn't immigration, it's emigration. People aren't leaving when they were told it's time to do so, and even if they do, it's a worthless directive without reciprocity from wherever they end up going.

"You don't have to go home, but you can't stay here" doesn't work with human existence. What you want fixed isn't solved by a wall, it's solved by deporting people to the Mariana Trench.

up
Voting closed 2

What did they expect?

up
Voting closed 2

We can expect that the best and the brightest will not only find a way here, but will find a way to get around our nonsensical, byzantine, patchwork nonsense "system" of immigration laws so that they can stay here and stay alive to contribute to our economy.

That's what we can expect when we have such cha/idi-otic migration policies as we do in the US.

up
Voting closed 2

My brother married his girlfriend to keep her here after her work visa ran out, but people without jobs are being let in?* If this strike zone for who gets to be here were an actual strike zone, I'd be kicking dirt on the umpire and screaming in his face.

*I'm okay with this on humanitarian grounds, I'm not a cable news (expletive)

up
Voting closed 1

people without jobs

The problem is that we make it hard for people who come here to work legally, even though we have a butt-ton of jobs that people don't want to work going empty.

Imagine if the T—which can't hire enough bus drivers these days—was able to get visa slots to bring over people who really, actually want to live here and don't mind working an 0430-1830 split shift five days per week. People love to complain about how service has gotten worse because there aren't enough workers, but god forbid some migrant comes here and … does the work.

We'd need to build more housing, too … and let me tell you about some hard-working people who might not have a perfect grasp of the language or advanced degrees but can certainly be trained to hammer nails or paint walls or lay pipe.

up
Voting closed 2

Now we just need for zoning laws to not be enforced so that the housing can be built.

up
Voting closed 2

And for the hazmat recycling facility to be built right next to where you live. And for your neighbor to build a brick wall six inches from your window. And let’s get rid of those pesky building codes and inspection requirements while we’re at it. Yeah baby, free market for the win!

up
Voting closed 1

I have like four decades left.

"House the people." - Steve Miller

up
Voting closed 2

Ban single family zoning statewide. People will create units for their families and houses will be split or upsized, ADUs built.

This would distribute housing into the suburbs where people want their young adults and/or their parents living in separate units in their now way too large homes.

up
Voting closed 3

Dover would look like 1919 Moscow in no time!

up
Voting closed 2

Toll record analysis can tell who is associating with who? WTF?

up
Voting closed 2

Who you place phone calls to, and who you receive phone calls from, says a huge amount about who you associate with. I'm not sure why this is surprising?

up
Voting closed 2

Phone call records.

up
Voting closed 2

Makes me say hmmmm....organized crime (or disorganized) is super happening all over and is just waiting to be caught.

up
Voting closed 1