Hey, there! Log in / Register

MBTA experiments with new signs to help the visually impaired navigate the system

Navilens marker at North Station

Photo by Turlach MacDonagh.

The MBTA is putting up brightly colored signs that sort of look like radically simplified QR codes as part of a pilot to try to help the visually impaired better get around the system with the help of a phone app that can read the signs.

These Navilens signs contain encoded data that translates into text that can appear and be read by the company's app. For example, the sign above translates to:

Left to Causeway Street, TD Garden, Commuter Rail, the outbound Orange and Green Line. This is MBTA North Station. Proceed left to access Causeway Street, TD Garden, Commuter Rail, Amtrack [sic], the Orange Line to Oak Grove, and the Greenline to Lechemere [sic].

"The MBTA is in the process of piloting and testing new accessible wayfinding technologies for riders who are blind or have low-vision – this decal is part of that roll out," MBTA spokeswoman Lisa Battison said, adding the T plans to provide more details soon.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

But it would be better if there were accessible infrastructure and signage in place, instead of making people download yet another private company's app. Not everyone has, wants to use, or can afford unlimited data for a mobile device.

What happens when the app is no longer supported? Or the company goes bankrupt?

Again the mbta does the least it possibly can through outsourcing and calls it an innovative solution.

up
32

Agree 100%. This looks like a private format that functions similarly to a QR code.

But a QR Code mounted on the wall, perhaps linked to a description on the MBTA website, wouldn't have relied upon the success or failure of a private vendor.

FWIW, my spouse is blind.

Navilens is a standard accessibility app that's been in place in much of the world. Previously, people for whom the large-print signage or Braille signage isn't accessible have had to use OCR apps to access MBTA signage. This is an improvement.

Some things with MBTA accessibility suck, but they do have an accessibility team of disabled people who are consulted for these decisions. I know some of the people on the team and I haven't heard anyone talk about this particular decision, which suggests to me that it's because it's fine and the VI people on the team didn't have something they wanted instead. It's circulating on my social media today among VI folks who are glad it's finally there.

The weakest link in terms of MBTA accessibility is actually the lack of staff training. The staff don't get direct training from the disabled folks, and just get a really quick overview that emphasizes their obligation to assist people. This is well-meaning, but the way it plays out is that staff tend to have no training in explaining who they are and why they're approaching someone, asking if the person wants help, and deferring to their explanations of what they do and don't need. They also do a lot of ableist things like speaking to people's friends and family members and asking the abled person if the disabled person needs assistance boarding or using the machines, and asking disabled people who they're with. More self-serve options that use an app is much less aggravating than having to deal with staff who are poorly trained in assisting disabled folks.

up
45

... having actually accessible infrastructure (chronically out-of-service escalators and elevators sound familiar?) and signage would make apps unnecessary.

It's great that people use this app and find this helpful, but im left to assume those who are applauding it don't have technology limitations themselves.

Navilens, like any app, will have failures and have downtime. Even if it doesn't, it's almost a 100% certainty that one day it just won't exist anymore. Why not spend the energy and money to make mass transit as accessible and understandable as possible in the first place?

I'm not saying it should be eliminated, but that it cannot be the only "solution".

*MBTA installs dynamic digital signage at all stations*

anon:

“MBTA once again lining the pockets of out of state contractors. this cannot be the only solution”

up
20

For people for whom Braille and large print signs aren't accessible, the option that's left is having a button-activated audio option on every MBTA sign. This would be expensive, would be a nightmare to maintain, and isn't a format anyone is accustomed to using. It doesn't work for DeafBlind people or people with poor auditory processing. Disabled folks are largely already using a personal mobile device with outputs and features that work for them and have been using this to OCR signage and so forth. NaviLens just makes this easier.

Can I ask where you're getting your information that app-based solutions aren't appropriate, and something else (that you won't specify) would be better? Your experiences aren't in line with what I hear from any of the many disabled folks in my circle.

up
33

One advantage of the Navilens system is it decodes into one of 34 languages (and growing), so users who don't read the local language aren't left hanging.

up
21

Are you low vision/have impaired vision? If not, I would definitely go with the experience of someone who has used or whose partner has used this type of technology. Improvements for accessibility should be broad to help the most people and often can help improve life for people who don't need them. Also, the cost of this program is probably not a ton, so it is another layer to help people.

Thank you for this insightful posts.

up
12

Like the app the MBTA has promoted to riders for several years.

The MBTA ended it's partnership with the Transit app like 5 years ago if that's what you're referring to.

up
12

Got it.

Give the T credit, announcements are clear. It appears that yellow track borders are in place everywhere and that there are typically people around to help.

Can anyone give an update on the Porter Square escalators? Having the area's largest stairmaster isn't something to be proud of. It has been a few months since I pantingly alighted there.

Is Eng wanted to aid visually impaired riders he would remove all the ad wrapping on train cars and buses and wash the windows more frequently rather than promote yet another data thieving tech company’s app. There’s no such thing as a “free” app.

Any transit system that cared about its passengers wouldn't obstruct the windows with ad wraps.

This parody transit system gets it right:
https://x.com/GoLocalMetro/status/1750932736368607476
"Looking For A New Perspective? Metro Bus Wraps Let You Experience What It's Like To Be Inside A Microwave!"

up
17

Ha!

If you had ever been to Japan and ridden a subway there - even Tokyo - the amount of advertising inside and outside of our trains is minuscule in comparison. Maximize ad revenue for every penny we can put into the system and maybe it, too, will be a step towards a truly word class system like Tokyo's. I wouldn't think a ChatGPT bot would be offended by advertisements, though.

This seems like a money grab. Making people download yet another app.

The signs do have those words. If you can't see them, you use your own mobile device to access them. People with no or very little vision (small percentage of VI folks) use a refreshable Braille output or audio/headphone output on their phone to access the information. People with some degree of usable vision will have their phone text size/contrast set so they can read the information on their screen.

Typically, if you have print information (restaurant menus, medical forms, concert programs, etc.) available to be sent to someone's personal mobile device, most VI folks can access it this way.

up
20

If you're blind you typically can't read. The idea is that the app can read the text out loud to the user. This concept has been used all over Europe for some time now.

I do want to clarify that about 30% of blind folks primarily read print in some format (usually with device settings like massively enlarged and adjusted to their preferred contrast, and holding the device right in the center of wherever their visual field is best). About 10% use Braille. About 30% primarily use audio reading. About 30% are severely multiply disabled and not literate in any format/don't have much language of any sort.

But yes, a lot of people who are print readers can't access a sign that's up on the wall, at an angle, might be much too small for them when it's several feet away.

Different people have different needs.

Most people find it easy to read black text on a white background, like this website's default layout. Most of the visitors to this website are probably comfortable reading in English.

Some people who visit this website are likely using their web browser's automatic translation to turn the English words into Korean, Mandarin, Spanish, or whatever other language they can read. This is not perfect, especially for longer and more complicated sentences and sentences with more negatives, but it is pretty good.

Some people can only read very large text that's very close to their faces. The built in zoom/resize options in almost all web browsers will let the same people achieve that effect on this site.

Some people who find reading difficult benefit from particular dyslexia-friendly fonts or medium-contrast content (like making the background of this site the color of an iced latte). There are apps and browser plug-ins on most devices that can make these changes, including letting the user adjust the exact shades of the text and background.

Other people find listening easier or better than reading. Most devices have speech-to-text settings that allow them to hear messages on their own earbuds/headset at a speed and volume that is comfortable for them.

A printed sign cannot be dynamically redesigned to support any of this.

All that being said, Navilens is being funded by private equity, and I don't have much information about how well-run this specific company is, how they plan to make money, or how long their products will be available. But apps for accessibility are a real and ongoing phenomenon.

I am legally blind, live in Boston and use the T frequently.

This particular setup would not be of much use to me. Of course I speak only for myself and I’m sure it will be of help to some.

With that being said:

How much will this project cost the MBTA and in how many instances will it be used in a given fiscal year? The data will be there, but will the mbta or the app developer ever share it?

In my journey as a disabled person, I have observed varying degrees of grift and waste around nearly every corner. I have my doubts about this project being much more than a pricey bit of virtue signaling.

My biggest obstacle as a blind T rider in Boston is the delinquent/criminal element that is so plainly pervasive on buses, trains, and around T stations. How about simply adding more MBTA police presence? The police can fight crime and occasionally give blind people a helping hand.

——————

Humorously, the captcha requirement to make this post has been the single greatest blindness related difficulty of my week.

up
12