Hey, there! Log in / Register

City, teachers' union announce plan to lengthen day at 60 schools

Richard Stutman of the Boston Teachers Union

As Walsh, students listen, BTU President Richard Stutman talks.

Mayor Walsh and Boston Teachers Union President Richard Stutman today announced agreement on a plan to add 40 minutes to the school day at the 60 elementary and middle schools in Boston that don't already have them.

Walsh said the move is a major step to ensuring "a world-class education for every student in the city." He said experience elsewhere and in Boston schools that already have longer days, such as the Trotter and Orchard Garden, show the extra time translates into better test scores, better educations and better beginnings for life.

The deal, which goes before union members next month, also calls for extra time for teacher professional development. In response to a question from an actual Boston high-school student, Walsh added that he and Stutman will be announcing plans later for how to pay for the extra course material and supplies necessary for the extra time.

Officials said the plan, when fully rolled out, will cost the city roughly $12.4 million a year and will mean roughly $4,500 a year in additional earnings for the teachers involved.

At a press conference at the Roslindale Community Center, city and union officials said, assuming teacher buy-in next month, will start rolling out next fall in 20 schools, with 20 more to follow in each of the following two years. The plan does not affect Boston high schools - or "turnaround," pilot and in-district charter schools - which already have longer days, but officials said they might take a new look at high-school days after the K-8 day is lengthened across the system.

Walsh and school officials said the phase in was partly due to cost but also to give time to figure out the best methods for implenting the extra instruction. Interim School Superintendent John McDonough said each school would be given autonomy to let the principal and teachers determine what exactly to teach in the extra time. Each school, he said has its own unique needs.

Walsh said he sat down with school officials and their counterparts at the teachers union to come up with a deal - unlike elsewhere in the country, where he said teachers have been blamed for many of the ills of society. "They were tough negotiations," he said. "They were fair negotiations."

Stutman returned the favor, saying McDonough "has been terrific to work with; he is collaborative, he is open." He said he probably talks to McDonough more than anybody else except for his wife and daughter.

Neighborhoods: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

a politician that actually does what he says he will do.

up
Voting closed 0

Boston's district schools still have one of the shortest school days in the country (and among the highest paid teachers with an avg. salary of nearly $90,000). With the BPS running a deficit, where is this $12.5M coming from? In addition, much of this "extra" time will go to teacher planning time versus teaching time, so not exactly the "win" some people are being led to believe. I'd love to see a fiscally responsible plan that would benefit kids more than the teachers and their future pensions.

up
Voting closed 0

will end up being $25 million when you calculate in all the other expenses not talked about here ie: custodial time, bus drivers, building maintenance and utilities.

up
Voting closed 0

Or are you pretty much saying, "I want inprovements in the school system, but I don't want to spend the money to get it"?

up
Voting closed 0

has been throwing money into the system since busing and anyone that can afford to send their kids to private schools has been doing so. The public schools basically suck and the former mayor had everyone foolishly believing that the schools improved.

up
Voting closed 0

But did he say he was going to do this? I know Connolly wanted this kind of change,

up
Voting closed 0

make for lousy whine.

up
Voting closed 0

Seriously, I was asking if his was something Walsh said he was going to do when running or not. I think it's a good idea and welcome, I just don't recall this being a kept promise vs a policy decision after taking office.

up
Voting closed 0

Walsh has a plan for working with the teachers union to make an extended school day available where parents support it. By contrast, Connolly would mandate an extended school day everywhere, but offers no plan to work with an already alienated teaching force on this issue.

October 12, 2013 (got it from a database, so no link, sorry)

Other stories at the time note that the differences between Walsh and Connolly were minimal. Essentially, Walsh would talk to the unions while Connolly would do it by fiat. Both were supporters of charter schools, but Connolly was stronger on the issue. However, Connolly made education the core of his campaign, while Walsh didn't.

up
Voting closed 0

I like Mayor Walsh, but he needs a new "neutral look" when he's standing around in these public events. He always looks slightly uncomfortable.

up
Voting closed 0

I'm pretty sure that's just his face.....

up
Voting closed 0

he looks serious. Would you rather a politician's fake smile?

up
Voting closed 0

I really hope that BTU agrees to this. My kids attend a school with a longer day and I believe it's better for their education, but it is also more practical for working parents.
With so many kids in this city starting school at different levels, extra time has been crucial in helping the teachers in my kids' school give kids the help they need at their level. Next on my dream wish list for BPS would be even smaller class sizes, but baby steps. I feel that this is an important first step.

up
Voting closed 0

Or does that guy look like Menino?

up
Voting closed 0

Very much so

up
Voting closed 0

Nice to see just another positive action by Mayor Walsh. What a breath of fresh air. Next up-How about allowing 50% of all seats in schools be filled by kids within walking distance of the school. Then only bus around the kids not within walking distance or beyond the 50% set asides. Put the savings from the busses into building NEW Schools.

up
Voting closed 0

It's not absolute, kids with siblings in a school get priority, but the 50%-of-seats for kids in the walk zone (1 mile) has been around for awhile now.

up
Voting closed 0

Was a good settlement all around. I commend all sides for working this out. The collaboration seems genuine. Congrats!

up
Voting closed 0

WBZ's Jon Keller asked some harsh questions that the union head was not the least bit ashamed of, when he should have been. Keller reported a number of charter schools have a day 2 hours longer, and the most the union would agree to is 40 minutes, eventually phasing it in.

Union guy Walsh is being soft on his union buddies as predicted.

up
Voting closed 0

Like whether the agreement, between the city and the union representing teachers in Boston Public Schools, would apply to teachers in charter schools, which are not part of the Boston Public Schools.

Keller also didn't ask how this arrangement is different from the one Menino tried to ram through - which would have required teachers to work extra hours without getting paid for them.

up
Voting closed 0

There are several in-district charters, so Keller isn't off completely. And it's not clear what will happen to teachers already working in pilots and charters that already have extended days.

up
Voting closed 0

So now Boston schools can suck for 40 more minutes a day?

up
Voting closed 0

BPS Average MCAS scores are rising. A lot of kids in BPS grow up in poverty. Poverty is the single biggest correlating factor in low test scores. Expanding pre-k is seen as a cost-effective way of closing the achievement gap.

up
Voting closed 0

Here are some interesting stats:

2003 School expenditures = $651 million for 61,552 students - cost per student = $10,576

2015 School budget = $975 million for 54,312 students - cost per student = $17,952

That's a roughly 70% increase. Even after adjusting for inflation - which is almost all salary increases while most of the world has gotten little or nothing over that time period - we have increased costs by 70% (and headcount has increased 2%).

Keep in mind also that in 2003 - we had 1003 pre-K students - now we have 2644 - these kids are very inexpensive to educate and the cost probably hasn't fluctuated much - meaning the cost per k-12 student is actually up closer to 80% over 12 years. We've gotten some incremental benefits -but nothing like I would expect if someone told me in 2003 that we'd increase costs by 80% over 12 years. We can argue all day over what we should spend - but I want more than that for my incremental education dollar.

up
Voting closed 0