Protest Against the ABC-TV Obamacare Infomercial
Protest Against Obamacare and the ABC-TV Obamacare Infomercial
ABC is going to be turning over
all of its news programming to the White House on Wednesday.
"Good Morning America" will be broadcasting from the South Lawn, "World News Tonight" will be broadcast from the Blue Room, and then in prime time, an hour-long infomercial from the White House will be aired to help Obama promote his vision of socialized medicine.
You can protest against this at our local ABC TV affiliate, WCVB (Channel 5).
Where: 5 TV Place
Needham Heights, ma 02494-2302
When:
9:30 pm Wednesday 6/24
"If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it's free."
-- P. J. O'Rourke
Ad:
Comments
Why would we want to protest this event?
You people who think that nationalized health care is the equivalent of Soviet Communism are ridiculous. The real comparison is the height of bureaucracy that the often monopolistic private health care industry has reached. When an organization is devised to work at odds with the services it is supposed to be providing, it will implode. Markets fail. Get over it. This movement must not.
Conservatives love rationing
Conservatives love rationing health care as long as it is rationed by the ability to pay.
well, yeah
Not to go all Milton Friedman on you, but that's how services are allocated in a capitalist system. That's why I use the laundromat instead of a pickup service.
-Cosmo
http://cosmocatalano.com
World's Toughest Writer
Why would we want to protest this event?
./potshot at anon: You speak like bureaucracy is bad, yet you offer no alternative. There are some fine hard working people in the govt services that try to help others regardless of the inane restrictions and controls that govt puts on even them. I agree with your comment, "When an organization is devised to work at odds with the services it is supposed to be providing, it will implode," as one option, it may implode.
Markets do not fail. Markets take advantage of opportunities. It isn't perfect, but neither are we. "Get over it."
potshot/.
I haven't heard from anyone about how this is going to work, and I mean real words, not words from our golden-tongued President, about how this is going to change, and that is going to change. It's just an initiative without details.
The bureaucracy of limiting
The bureaucracy of limiting scarce resources in a system that is not designed to provide the service it is supposed to provide IS bad. All organizations have bureaucracy. I'm arguing that an organization that is set up to provide health care instead of health insurance is preferable. I agree that government can work. I agree with the teabaggers that the communist form of government Soviet style did not (I actually worked for a time in a job attempting to dismantle post-Soviet bureaucracy to help markets flow).
Markets DO fail. When one part or entity in a transaction has more power or knowledge to get the upperhand, the market has failed. The field is called economics. I made no implication that I think that all markets are a failure -- quite to the contrary.
The way it works is that the government pays for health care and negotiates for reduced prices. It happens every day in countries around the world. Even the US pharmaceutical companies already have people and units set up to deal with the negotiations with foreign governments. This idea has been new for decades? The result is that companies' owners, like those pharmaceutical execs with estates north of Boston, have to downsize to say, oh, maybe only 50 acres and 20,000 square feet. Cry them a river.
Has anyone ever thought that publicly-paid-for health care might actually lead to MORE advances in medicine because more people will be able to access services that they have denied themselves? What happens if many of them can regain their ability to produce economically in an open market? We, as a country, cannot continue to compete with countries with universal health care if we continue to force businesses to provide this expensive service and the costs continue to double every seven years.
The other issue is that we have to kick the AMA until they stop trying to limit the supply of doctors graduating from med school. There's another market failure for you.
You are mistaken
Markets DO fail. I tell you this as someone who is very pro-market (because they are usually pretty good). Please educate yourself on the subject.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Market_failure
Markets don't fail? Guess
Markets don't fail?
Guess that depends on how you define "failure", doesn't it?
what the hell does this have to do with Boston?
Why is this on the front page?
re: Why would we want to protest this event?
What monopoly are you referring to? I can think of several health care insurance providers (I just google'd it and found over 20 companies). A monopoly would mean that there's only one insurance provider; this clearly is not the case.
Proponents of Obama's health care plan believe that modern health care insurance providers don't charge the lowest rate possible. If that were the case, then why haven't any of these proponents started up their own insurance company? I'm no Einstein, but if two people were selling the same product, but at different prices, I would obviously buy the cheaper product; this is no different from health insurance either.
Near monopolies exist in many states
Massachusetts clearly does not have a monopoly in the health insurance, but some states (yes, I know that this may come as a surprise to some, there are 49 others) have mega-corporations with monopolistic powers. The other issue is that prices are often regulated, so the prices that are set can be controlled by the most powerful players. Market failure on two sides.
Notice that it's not just Republicans who are fighting this public option? What good is a health insurance provider if they have all the information they need about you, but you have no power over the deal. It's often not even a take it or leave it for some; it's a "leave it or leave it" because people simply can't find healthcare. This is a system failure. We should provide health care, not health insurance.
All righty then
I think I might go to this -- if nothing else, I'd probably double the head count just by showing up.
Dave, answer me a serious question: if a public option is going to be such a horrible, expensive, bureaucratic hornswoggle, doesn't that mean that the private insurance companies have nothing to worry about because no one who has private insurance now would choose to move to the public option?
The Problem
Might the problem be that federal health care might be something you won't be able to opt out of?
(Just offering a possible answer to Stewart's question. Basically, I couldn't give a damn less.)
Suldog
http://jimsuldog.blogspot.com
Unlikely. While I'd love
Unlikely. While I'd love nothing better than to see the private health insurance industry put out of business (here's their model: pay us a lot of money for a service, and we'll avoid giving you this service and make you pay more if you actually manage to get us to give you service. How is this not criminal, again?), the idea is that the government just basically offers the absolute bottom of the barrel so everybody has at least SOME coverage. I don't think it CAN compete with private health care, let alone WANTS to.
I'm baffled by the idea that Obama is somehow going to put private insurers out of business. The man himself said it best; if the health insurance industry is as robust and competitive as it itself claims, a government run plan will not be a problem.
2/3rds say all Americans should have health insurance
299/300ths say all Americans should be billionaires
I'm just saying.
If we want to base national policy on majority opinion, I'm cool with that. However, I'm not gay, so I don't have to worry about same-sex marriage being shot down (when the issue has come up for a public vote, it has more often than not been the opinion of the voters that it should not be legal.) And I'm not black or Latino or Asian, so I don't have to worry if the majority decides, as it so often has in the past, that Jim Crow laws and other racist statutes are okey-dokey. And I'm not female, so if the majority decides to revert to pre-1920 opinions concerning suffrage, what the hell do I care? I'm also not poor, so...
You understand, of course. As the old saying goes, "Democracy is two wolves and a sheep deciding what to have for dinner." Trying to prove correctness of action via polling is, at best, naive.
Suldog
http://jimsuldog.blogspot.com
Jim, you seem like an
Jim, you seem like an intelligent person, so I'll explain this to you politely: when you compare government spending to human rights issues, as libertarians seem to love to do, you just automatically lost the argument, because you're no longer arguing policy, you're arguing gut feelings.
Just to rebuke your argument on a strict policy level, though, yes, if a majority of the people tell you something, it's generally your job to implement it. That's the way it works for elected officials, which is why SCOTUS isn't elected. And you're right, that can lead to unfortunate decisions because people as a group are generally stupid.
On the other hand, I haven't seen any compelling arguments on here aside from what I'll politely call the usual canned arguments. Give the rest of us something more than jerked knees and your personal biases to work with here.
Anon, You Also Seem Like A Decent Sort Of Anon
OK, enough buttering up :-)
To clarify: I wasn't attempting to argue for or against health care of any sort. If my previously oft-stated Libertarian opinions led you to believe that I was, my apologies for not being clearer in this instance.
I was simply pointing out that using polling results to buttress logic is flimsy and limiting. Once you do so, you open yourself up to other polling results on other issues being used to contradict your reasonably thought out arguments on those issues, and so on, until you have no room to do anything but march in lockstep with the majority, no matter how absurd the majority opinion may seem to you on a particular issue. Citing polls may be impressive to some folks, but not to me. That's all I was saying, in my usual overly-verbose and bloviating way :-)
Suldog
http://jimsuldog.blogspot.com
Thanks for the heads up.
Thanks for the heads up. I'll DVR it so I can watch when I get home. I can't wait for heath care reform. Imagine having a choice when BC/BS jacks up their premiums from $399/mo to $500/mo. Does anyone else here pay their own health insurance premium out of pocket?
Yes, I'm a healthy 19 year
Yes, I'm a healthy 19 year old and pay $389/month for my HC.
Communists!
I hear there's going to be actual communists there! You guys should bring your guns just in case.
huh?
This looks like an ad for Sham Wow - oh, wait, I get it - the protest is a Sham.
Somehow I think if Bush had
Somehow I think if Bush had the media run what amounted to a massive free PR campaign/Infomericial, I doubt you all would be so pleased.
Whenever you think people getting upset over something Barry does is silly, ask yourself, "what if Bush did it?" before mocking criticism .
Anyway, I have one big question for you.....
What ever happened to questioning authority, speaking truth to power, or the quote (incorrectly attributed to Jefferson) "dissent is the highest form of patriotism"?
Or is that suddenly to inconvenient now?
Where have you been the last eight years?
The Bush government ran more than one massive free PR campaign/infomercial on FOX. Obama might have gotten the idea from them. Maybe in a few years, his press secretary can take a job at a network, like Tony Snow did, and hook him up with some more.
On September 20, 2006, Fox aired an infomercial on Don Rumsfeld called "Why He Fights." It included the host, Bret Baier, traveling with Rumsfeld to Iraq several times, meeting with him at the Pentagon, etc. It was billed as an "exclusive look... We'll examine how Rumsfeld used that concept to win a lightning victory in Afghanistan and, in the process, became one of America's most popular and admired leaders."
Brett Baier of Fox did a special infomercial called "Dick Cheney: No Retreat," aired on Oct 13 2007, billed as a "documentary" and an "exclusive interview."
On Oct. 30 2007, Greta Van Susteren did an infomercial about Laura Bush's "mideast tour."
Baier did another infomercial on 2 and 3 Feb 2008 called ”George W. Bush: Fighting to the Finish”, in which he “was granted unprecedented access by George W. Bush…This historic documentary — shot in high definition — takes you inside the Oval Office, to the president's Texas ranch, aboard Air Force One and into his private sanctums in the White House residence.”
It’s funny to mash up the FOX whining with the FOX bragging about doing the same thing a year ago.
Wow, so one network isn't
Wow, so one network isn't hostile to Bush and THAT'S A BIG DEAL!
But iT'S NO BIG DEAL that ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, et al are humping Barry's leg more than Bo the dog?
Your IP address has been tracked
The next person who knocks on your mom's door upstairs will be a muslim storm trooper. And they're bringing a stem cell clone of Bo the dog to hump your head with a brain-reprogramming wet willie. Resistance is futile.
Sockpuppet, you owe me a new netbook!
Sockpuppet,you owe me a new netbook!
That comment triggered an explosive nasal lavage with diet pepsi, the universal solvent!
wait...
...what?
Confused
Does this count as a teabag event? Should I bring teabags?
So, Universal Hub is run by
So, Universal Hub is run by Republican Tea Party supporters?
You'd like that, wouldn't you?
Anybody with an account can post an article here. Doesn't mean I or anybody else has to agree with them, but he's free to make his case (I did pull it off the home page because, as somebody noted, it's not really directly related to Boston).
Thanks for clearing that up.
Thanks for clearing that up.
Can we just delete this crap?
And then tell the Herald to keep their commenters to themselves...
I'd give Dave more leeway
Because he's a longtime regular (loyalty counts for something). But, yes, it's not really Boston related, which is why it's off the homepage and out of the RSS feed.
Needham is pretty close to Boston
While I don't agree with the proposed protest at all, WCVB is located in a nearby suburb,. Presumably the protest is asking the local station not to carry these programs from the ABC network feed but instead to substitute some other programming.
Wow, how'd I miss that?
I goofed. Yeah, this belongs on the home page as much as the Harvard protest, given that it's a protest in Needham. I guess I'm just one of those damn libruls who got so turned off by the top of the post I missed that part way at the bottom.
Tags
With tags like "ball wash" and straight up LIES like "ABC turning all news operation over to White House", I guess he's lucky he logged in 4 years ago. I'll be sure to post my slanted anti-burrito bullshit ("they give you cancer!") as long as I promise to "organize" a protest at the local Chipotle by listing its address.
Unless he's using a different editor to submit this than I am, the line breaking suggested to me that he just cut'n'paste the entire thing from somewhere else on the web (not like the kind of people attracted to an event like this actually think for themselves anyways). That more than the content is what suggested to me that it should be deleted, honestly.
If he wanted to post a flyer, he should pay you and post one over there ->>
Yay, Teabagging is Back!!!
Oh, it turns me on when those Republican and conservative guys talk about Teabagging!
(ref: link in post above to website http://bostonteaparty.ning.com/ )
Who's gonna bring their teabags along? Who gets to be the first teabagger?
Mmmmmm... I can taste the tea already... Slurp!!!
a dick armey
"For most Americans, April 15th will be tax day, but … its going to be tea bagging day for the right wing and they’re going nuts for it. Thousands of them whipped out the festivities, early this past weekend and, while the parties are officially toothless, the tea baggers are full-throated about their goals. They want to give president Obama a strong tongue lashing and lick government spending ...if you are planning simultaneous tea bagging all across the country, you’re going to need a Dick Armey."
Go Obama - Absolutley and Please, Health Care Reform ASAP
The do nothings of the health care industry have been having their way for way too long and they will stop at nothing to keep their 12% piece of the GDP pie. Do anything you can to support Obama against these greedy naysayers.