Hey, there! Log in / Register

Alleged sadistic, slave-driving pizzeria owner now faces even more than 20 years in prison

The owner of Stash's Pizza in Dorchester and Roslindale, who had been arrested on a single count of "forced labor," which carries a maximum possible sentence of 20 years, has been indicted by a federal grand jury on seven counts of forced labor and attempted forced labor, each of which carries a possible separate sentence of 20 years, the US Attorney's office reports.

That's one count for each of the seven employees whom federal investigators have identified as bearing the brunt of Stavros Papantoniadis's alleged sadism and penury, which the feds say included not just refusing to pay workers what they were due but using beatings and intimidation to keep them from fleeing his pizza shops, which at one point included several suburban outlets as well.

He twice beat one employee so badly that the man had to have surgery on his testicles after one of the attacks and had to have all his teeth removed after the other, a Homeland Security agent writes in an affidavit laying out the case against Papantoniadis, a West Roxbury native who later moved to Westwood. Papantoniadis also repeatedly called the man - an immigrant without papers from Northern Africa - "a fucking Muslim" to his face. He punched another worker in the chest in front of other employees and would throw pens and knives at workers, the affidavit continues, adding that in one case, he called 911 in Norwood to report a worker who had just said he was quitting as a hit-and-run driver.

The feds charge Papantoniadis sought out undocumented immigrants as workers because he knew he could keep them in line, giving him an advantagein the competitive Boston-area pizza market, the US Attorney's office charges:

It is alleged that Papantoniadis' conduct enabled him to obtain a substantial financial benefit and an advantage over other businesses in the local pizza market. He could operate Stash’s Pizza with fewer and cheaper workers over whom he allegedly exercised significant control, all of which reduced his businesses' labor and operating costs.

Papantoniadis has been behind bars since his March 16 arrest. A federal magistrate judge ordered him held until the outcome of his trial because of the potential threat he posed to the workers he had allegedly terrorized.

Innocent, etc.

Indictment (1.2M PDF).

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

Other than that Mrs. Lincoln, how is the pizza?

up
Voting closed 0

....but I do admit that the headline made me chuckle.

up
Voting closed 0

This guy was mean definitely made it uncomfortable for customers who knew his evil soul.

up
Voting closed 0

How did it take so long for this beast to go down?

up
Voting closed 0

I have a big problem with people who get multiple sentences and they run concurrent. What's the point? 4 concurrent 20 year sentences is not 80 years.
This D-Bag deserves all that he gets sentenced with and I certainly hope they run consecutively. That guy should never see the light of day!

up
Voting closed 0

What's sad is you know this fucker is the tip of the iceberg, the 0.1% that actually gets caught.

up
Voting closed 0

I strongly doubt there are 1000 more in the area who are doing what he did, to the *extent* he did. But there are certainly many who are using forced labor that is less visibly violent.

up
Voting closed 0

ou just don't see the word penury used much any more. Honestly though its use in this situation perfectly fits the bill.

Penury suggests a cramping or oppressive lack of money. What better way to keep your employees bound to you than giving them just enough money to maybe house themselves.

up
Voting closed 0

I think some crimes should be punished by varying degrees of impoverishment, up to and including reduction to penury. This would be particularly appropriate for crimes involving the power that those who have money have over those who don't. Bosses who steal from their employees, snake-oil salesmen who defraud the poor, the careless wealthy who break whatever they touch, and use their wealth to intimidate whoever complains. For someone who is sentenced to serious time, as Papantoniadis may be, it may not make much difference, but many wealthy criminals do a few months, or a year or two, ant then return to their former condition. Fines can be imposed, but this is backwards; the best measure of the seriousness of the punishment is not how much is taken, but how much is left. How about a fine of net worth minus, say, $40K? The exemption (rather than the fine itself) could be adjusted to match the seriousness of the offense. For some, the exemption would be $0; this would be reduction to absolute penury. I will not name names of those who I think deserve this (though I am sorely tempted), because that would just be self-indulgence. The principle, though, I think is sound.

up
Voting closed 0

be entitled to reparations?

up
Voting closed 0

$330,000 in back wages in 2019 (in a civil case that led to the current criminal case).

up
Voting closed 0