Hey, there! Log in / Register

Feds threaten to ban track workers from MBTA subway lines starting Monday after one is seriously injured on the Blue Line unless the T shapes up quickly

The Federal Transit Administration yesterday demanded the MBTA take "immediate action" to correct safety problems it says are still endangering T workers ten months after it issued several urgent directives about safety problems on MBTA subway lines.

The order, which demands the T take a series of specific actions by Monday, or else face a ban on track work, comes after "an employee was seriously injured while working on the ROW [right of way] in a location where access had not been requested or granted – a major violation of MBTA’s ROW safety procedures" on the morning of April 13 and after the T had five other near misses involving trains and track workers between March 13 and April 14.

The order does not specify on which line the worker was injured. However, a worker was injured around 1 a.m. on April 13 while working on overhead power lines on the Blue Line at Revere Beach.

The order emphasizes the T's need to figure out what to do about deficiencies in the radio systems used to dispatch workers to work sites - and to develop a system in which workers do not fear retribution if they report problems. And it says that, effective immediately, the T can expect surprise visits by federal inspectors.

In a letter to new MBTA General Manager Phillip Eng detailing the order, Associate FTA Administrator Joe DeLorenzo demanded the T submit daily reports to both the FTA and the state Department of Public Utilities, starting Thursday, showing which T workers were on subway tracks, the authorization forms letting them do work on tracks, along with "name, badge number, access location start point and end point, and associated access start and end times" for the crews and "the work site hazard assessments completed" before crews were released to go on the tracks. Also, the feds want to see daily reports, signed by Eng and other top MBTA officials, "showing actual track access granted to work crews, by line, and documenting any identified deficiencies in ROW access protocols."

But that's only the beginning. DeLorenzo said that on Monday, he will order an immediate ban on MBTA track work unless the T submits detailed reports identifying what they learned from the recent incidents, an analysis of whether the T and its workers can safely support increased track work during service hours as it struggles to eliminate slow zones and problems caused by limitations in the T's radio systems.

This analysis needs to look at the effects of extra track work on a range of T workers, "including OCC dispatchers, Engineering & Maintenance department scheduling coordinators, operations superintendents, night trackmasters, operations construction supervisory personnel, flaggers, crew forepersons, and motorpersons."

DeLorenzo then set another potential work ban of May 5, should the T now submit a detailed report by then on how it plans to improve communications between track work crews, train drivers and dispatchers and to devise new training and testing for track workers.

At an MBTA board meeting this morning, Eng and other T officials said they are committed to working with the FTA and the state to solve the issue. He acknowledged that "near miss are avoidable and should not be happening," and that safety retraining for some 1,000 T managers has included a focus on the "breakdown of communications" that led to the recent incidents and how to avoid it.

Topics: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon Compete order213.35 KB


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

It does, however, emphasize the T's need to figure out what to do about deficiencies in the radio systems used to dispatch workers to work sites - and to develop a system in which workers do not fear retribution if they report problems.

up
Voting closed 0

Maybe the Feds would need to kick in some $$, but giving workers enough money to retire on (or in that ballpark) if their claim of retaliation isn't bullshit would incentivize some cultural change real fast.

up
Voting closed 2

The injured employee was not hit by a train, they were injured while working on overhead wire repairs on the Blue Line.

up
Voting closed 1

I should've realized that. Story updated.

up
Voting closed 1

Firing all the management sounds nice to the lizard brain but simply isn't realistic if we want to avoid a complete shutdown, which I think unfortunately has just entered the realm of possibility. How else do you attack this sort of organizational rot? Some sort of bounty program?

up
Voting closed 0

Firing all management? Huh! The T can't fill it's existing openings. Go ahead and fire everyone and you will have to shutdown the entire system.

up
Voting closed 1

Will be most pleased by this.

up
Voting closed 0

And the only way to make sure the unqualified cronies, cousins, and friends of all the dead weight don't just get promoted.

up
Voting closed 0

As the T further descends into the depths of hell, it's full speed ahead on "transit oriented development". This includes limited or no parking spaces in new buildings, the assumption that people will not own cars, and the assumption that people living and working in those new buildings will take the T.

We truly live in Bizzaro World.

up
Voting closed 1

The assumption is that the T's issues, severe though they are, are short-term and will be resolved. Requiring extra parking in new construction constrains the housing supply and locks in car dependence for decades, and it's objectively silly to do that in response to a situation that will hopefully improve within a few years.

It's like people who thought the entire concept of downtowns in cities, a phenomenon thousands of years old, was over forever because of a pandemic that was likely to last 2-3 years. Silly in retrospect, right?

up
Voting closed 1

objectively silly to do that in response to a situation that will hopefully improve within a few years.

I would say it's objectively more silly to think the T will improve within a few years.

up
Voting closed 0

So you're in favor of having more cars on Boston streets? Am I understanding correctly?

up
Voting closed 1

I don't know anyone who wants more cars on Boston streets. However the current theory and practice pretends people living near T stops do not/will not want to or need to use cars because they will use the T.

So the result of ignoring reality will be more cars, and not enough places to park them.

Fix the T first, or even show significant progress. Then tell me how great it is to eliminate parking spaces.

up
Voting closed 0

Boston was built and worked fine for nearly 300 years without cars.

Perhaps cars are the problem and not the answer?

up
Voting closed 0

New guy just getting thrown right in there. Not like he didn't know what he was getting into, but geez. Good luck to him.

up
Voting closed 1

As far as I am concerned, "new guy" has two strikes against him already. HIs statement that he finds the slow zones "relaxing" really pisses me off. He clearly doesn't get it.

For the record Mr. Eng, the slow zones I experience on the Ashmont Line are not fucking relaxing.

up
Voting closed 0

That's enraging, but I like to verify he actually said it. Apparently he did per reporter on Twitter twitting it, but her follow up tweet added more to the quote

Even if there's slow speeds right now, it's much more relaxing. I enjoy sitting on the train. I enjoy sitting and having that time to myself.

We're all in a rush and I understand time is precious to everybody, but I enjoy mass transportation, that's why I took this role and I want everyone else to start enjoying it too. Because every precious minute of their time that they're not at home and with their families, I understand that's lost time. We're doing to restore that back to them

https://twitter.com/lexcohan/status/1645452894546669569

The full context does seem to change the meaning a little. I mean he's not trying to saying slow zones are actually nice and enjoyable. Though I can see any PR reframing is questionable too still. I'll leave it to your own judgement, but I think the full context is important.

up
Voting closed 1

Slow zones suck. There is nothing, I repeat, nothing good about them. Eng is talking out of both sides of his mouth.
And furthermore, he has not experienced slow zones every day, twice a day, like so many of us have.
I don't trust this guy until and unless he earns my trust with actions instead of words.

up
Voting closed 0

may not be enough :-(

But, yeah, the news is going to get a lot worse before it gets better as we find out all that's been ignored or covered up in T-land.

up
Voting closed 0

Are they using repaired radios from WW2?

up
Voting closed 0

or the Civil War.

up
Voting closed 1

They're made from the best tin cans and string money can buy.

up
Voting closed 0

The T badly needs to be repaired, but the thing that does the repairs needs to be repaired. There truly seems no way out of this Gordian knot.

up
Voting closed 1

What sucks is clearly all of this has been a nightmare for ages, and just been covered up, plastered over, and ignored. Now it's all falling on the heads of the new administration. At least it seems like the new team isn't making an effort to suppress things. But it still sucks.

Like buying a new house and taking down wood paneling only to find out the previous owners put it up to hide a massive leak, mold, and structural cracks. No way but forward.

up
Voting closed 0

Not a word about it on the Globe website. We really are facing a shutdown.

up
Voting closed 1

Above the fold.

If you gripe about the decline of the Globe, ponder how much you pay for their coverage.

up
Voting closed 1

Most people have it online.

up
Voting closed 0

But I will say "you're welcome" for your thanks to me for being a print subscriber.

Again, if you want to know what is on the front page of the Boston Globe, look at the front page of the Boston Globe. I'll even bet that if you looked hard enough, the articles that appeared on the front page of the Boston Globe today are on the newspaper's webpage, including day 3 of the coverage of the incident in Newton that Adam has finally mentioned.

up
Voting closed 1

It wasn’t about how great you are for getting a print copy of the Globe compared to paying for the website. I did not thank you for anything or imply such. It’s about the website being where most people access it. They wouldn’t have known about this unless they’d seen it here and that’s not good. Congratulations for getting a print copy. You’re just so awesome for doing so. Happy?

up
Voting closed 2

If your paper allergy has you avoiding the print edition, perhaps you can do a better job reading the online edition before you claim the Globe had no reporting on the issue.

up
Voting closed 1

You can see what is in the print edition online.

Can't read the articles, but you can see the headlines.

up
Voting closed 0

So it's in such a bad state of disrepair it's become too unsafe to actually repair it.

Time to stick a bunch of red X's on all the stations, demolish the thing. Fill the tunnels in with concrete, and forget it existed.

up
Voting closed 2

Now go live in Detroit where you seem to want to live.

Better yet, Gary, Indiana.

Or maybe Charlie Baker's garage as squatter's rights? You seem to want to be as close as possible to his Koch -addled vision of the future.

up
Voting closed 1