Hey, there! Log in / Register

As state reps tell the T to cut the fare crap, Grabauskas says he was scapegoated over fares

A squadron of state representatives are telling MBTA officials this afternoon that the idea of fare increases or service cuts this year is simply unacceptable because the legislature approved the $160 million T officials initially said was enough to keep the T operating this year.

Meanwhile, Dan Grabauskas told the Globe today he was fired because Deval Patrick needed a scapegoat in the fare debate, because he told Patrick minions weeks ago no fare increase was needed.

State Rep. Marty Walz told T officials is particularly outraged that the T is even thinking of raising fares when it had enough money to buy out Grabauskas's contract. The Gardner Auditorium erupted in cheers and shouts when she said that.

State Rep. Marie St. Fleur said she wants the same thing for her constituents in Dorchester and Roxbury that turnpike drivers got: A year of relief so the new transporation department coming in Nov. 1 can figure out the mess. She said it is outrageous that riders have to pay for state mismanagement and her constituents still don't have the decent high-speed transit promised them when the Orange Line el came down in the 1980s.

"My constituents cannot afford another tax from the T," she said.

Tom Tinlin, Boston's transportation commissioner, said Mayor Menino is opposed to the proposed increases and cuts. The city will pay $74 million in T assessments this year, he said. "We pay our fair share and our residents deserve more."

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 
Free tagging: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

duh?

up
Voting closed 0

This should not be a political football, to be lied about. Aloisi declared in JUNE *before* the sales tax increase was passed, that the MBTA would need to raise fares AND get the $160 million to close the budget gap (for this year).

The state's transportation secretary announced today that fare increases of 15 percent to 20 percent would be necessary on the MBTA this fall, even if the Legislature comes through with an expected $160 million -- likely from a sales tax increase -- to help plug the current deficit.

So these so-called indignant representatives are either STUPID or LIARS to act as if this was the first they'd heard of the fare increases necessary to cope at the MBTA.

So, which is it, representatives? Are you STUPID or LIARS?

up
Voting closed 0

So, which is it, representatives? Are you STUPID or LIARS?

This is the Massachusetts Legislature - the two are not mutually exclusive.

up
Voting closed 0

Adam, has anyone considered taking the debt back onto the state as a proposed solution? The state could steal pennies per person to cover the obligation whereas the T needs to take dollars per rider to cover the same amount of money.

But I'm guessing this is all about grandstanding and not about solutions. So, screw getting anything productive out of this meeting.

up
Voting closed 0

But several of the state reps mentioned debt tied to the Big Dig and the need to let the new Department of Transportation (which goes live Nov. 1) figure out overall transportation debt issues.

up
Voting closed 0

What if the MBTA got fully swallowed up by the newly (re)formed MASS DOT? Think about it! The MBTA has no GM right now, so no head to cut off or fit into the established structure. It's debt needs to be taken by the State anyways. The legislature is currently railing about how mismanaged everything is (even though it's their fault all along that the system is fiscally broken in all ways imaginable)...

What if the State got to control the agency with the Governor, officially, directly responsible? What if the ineffectual board were gone? What if we were more like every other large public transit agency in the nation?

Man, a guy can dream; can't he?

up
Voting closed 0

The T will become part of the new DOT, which for you fans of Robert Caro's bio of Robert Moses, is actually structured as an authority.

up
Voting closed 0

Oh, right, it was going to replace the current board with the DOT 5-member board...but if I recall, a bunch of its aspects (budget?) will still be independent of the state agency.

up
Voting closed 0

The reform legislation keeps the MBTA as a separate agency, but the Mass DOT will have a large amount of oversight as of Nov 1, and the Mass DOT Board will also be the MBTA board after that date. The MBTA Advisory Board (made up of reps from the 175 cities and towns in the MBTA district) will no longer have the power to approve/disapprove the MBTA budget. The Mass DOT/MBTA board will have the final say on approving the budget.

http://www.mass.gov/legis/bills/senate/186/st02/st...

up
Voting closed 0

Maybe Deval should have waited until AFTER this boondoggle of a meeting to can the General Manager. Instead he did it leading up to the meeting thinking his sacrificial lamb would divert attention away from Aloisi and himself. Instead it just focused that attention because hey Grabby is gone, no use in blaming him anymore he has no power as of *looks at watch* oh a few days ago.

Bad political move Governor Patrick.

up
Voting closed 0

" "I screamed at the TV at home," he said. "You're going to steal my plan and then let [Governor Deval] Patrick rescue the farepayers? It's Orwellian. This is what I've been putting up with for the past two and a half years."'

Thats exactly what I assumed was happening here.

How much did the Dan buyout cost?

How much will this cost:
" Aloisi said that the fare increase would be put on hold until former John Hancock CEO David D'Alessandro can conduct a top-to-bottom financial review of the T"

I regret voting for Deval and will NOT be voting for him again.

up
Voting closed 0

Legislators could have taken the golden opportunity presented to them when an alliance of the Greater Boston Chamber and other pro-business lobbies registered their concern over the crumbling transportation infrastructure and responsibly came out in favor of a 25 cent gas tax hike. We would then be talking about a real capital program to shore up the existing assets and perhaps, maybe, even a little responsible expansion.

Rather than doing so, legislators chose to follow their "leadership" and went for the idiotic sales tax hike.

When fares are raised I hope they are all voted out of office as a result of being exposed as ineffective or naive. I don't care which.

up
Voting closed 0

How does it go?

"When robbing Peter to pay Paul, you will always have Paul on your side."

up
Voting closed 0

I am hoping we hear more from Dan about the inner workings of this entire brouhaha and other famous MBTA disasters. I'm hoping that since he's freed from having to talk from behind that opaque wall of PR and bullshit that surrounds the MBTA, plus he's incredibly bitter about the circumstances surrounding his departure, he'll be only more than happy to give us more insight into the agency.

It was wrong of me to blast Dan previously just because he was a figurehead. Unfortunately when you're mad at an agency that prides itself in not having to disclose anything that doesn't go thru a PR mouthpiece, you see only one target to focus your frustrations on. Who's to say he didn't have better plans that were quashed by other officials? I dunno. I guess I ought to have given him a break long ago, but it's so hard to rail against "The T" as this nebulous entity when you're not sure (or think you're sure) who's exactly responsible for the bad decisions that have left this public transit system in the horrible, sorry mess that it is today.

I guess the best analogy I can come up with is that this is like working for a company that has only one publically accessible phone number. You may be a lowly switchboard operator and have no say at all in any of the day-to-day business of the company, but that doesn't stop angry consumers from calling up and without even so much as asking for customer relations or what have you, immediately launch into a laundry list of all their problems. They do this because that's the only number they've got. And when you attempt to transfer them to someone who can take down their complaints, you're accused of giving them the runaround and how dare you.

(Disclosure: I've never worked at a switchboard, but I've sat next to one before and heard nothing but that all day.)

Dan was the only number we had, and now we learn that he was getting it from both sides now. I guess what I'm feeling now is this Earth emotion you call remorse. But only slightly.

up
Voting closed 0

Having to operate in bureaucratic quagmires means we don't see the human side of these folks. When they can let their guard down and say what's on their mind, suddenly they become more engaging.

Perhaps Grabauskas could've managed situations better, but I think he got caught in a lot of crossfires.

I'm looking forward to see what rabbit the Governor pulls out of his hat as far as new T leadership goes. Part of me thinks that no clear thinking individual would take that job.

up
Voting closed 0

Part of me thinks that no clear thinking individual would take that job.

Yeah after seeing these guys clonk the last General Manager I wonder who would be stupid enough to take the reigns. Dan says no do not raise the fares, Jim says raise the fares, Dan loses the fight, Deval comes over and blames Dan for the hike while Jim stands in the back ground saying "I told him it was a bad idea to raise the fares, but he wouldnt listen, he's crazy."

I am a bit jaded.

up
Voting closed 0

Transcript of the tweeting I was doing yesterday.

up
Voting closed 0