Hey, there! Log in / Register

Court concludes long-time worker at Brookline Trader Joe's wasn't fired because of her age but because she bought beer for her underage grandson, who also worked there

A federal appeals court today agreed with a lower-court judge that the manager of the Coolidge Corner Trader Joe's had a legitimate reason to fire a 77-year-old worker, because she had been caught buying beer for her 19-year-old grandson, who also worked at the store at the time.

Gloria Cocuzzo sued the chain and the store manager in 2022, alleging she was fired because of her age, and despite a long record of outstanding reviews, bonuses and raises.

But in its ruling, the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Boston said that even in looking at the facts in a light most favorable to Cocuzzo, she violated both Trader Joe's policy and state law when when her grandson picked out two four-packs, then handed it to her so she could pay for them at a register.

The court rejected her attorney's argument that bias was proven in several ways, including in the cases of six Trader Joe's employees under 40 who got only reprimands for selling alcohol to minors:

Of those six individuals, five were written up for neglecting to check the identification of underage customers attempting to buy alcohol, and Cocuzzo offers no evidence that these employees knew that the customers were underage. By contrast, Cocuzzo concedes that she purchased alcohol for an individual she knew to be nineteen years old -- a distinction that is sufficiently significant that comparing the five proffered employees to Cocuzzo would be inapt.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon Complete ruling176.41 KB


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

But that isn't what happened here.

Sheesh - what ever happened to just texting grandma with your selections and letting her buy them for you to hand off at home or outside the store? Or, maybe, scrawling what you want on a post-it? I had a rather permissive family in that regard but at least try to be discreet!

up
Voting closed 25

At some point, Cocuzzo and Quinn went to the alcohol section of the store together, and Quinn selected beer from the shelf. Quinn then handed the beer to Cocuzzo, and Cocuzzo purchased the beer. When asked during her deposition, "You purchased the beer for Mr. Quinn?" Cocuzzo responded, "Yes." Quinn was born in July 2001, making him nineteen years old at the time.

oops

up
Voting closed 12

A 19 year old man should, of course, be able to legally buy beer. He can live homeless on the streets, shoot up on the streets, easily get weed, be prescribed powerful mind psychotropic drugs with terrible side effects. He can be sent to fight and die in a war zone. Nope: Can't buy beer.

up
Voting closed 21

Military servers; Bowling alleys, Rec Halls, NCO and Officers clubs have been ignoring state age limits since at least WWII if the stories are correct. If you could be drafted or allowed to volunteer to fight for your country you could damn well drink beer.

That being said she violated both Trader Joe's policy and state law so her employment was terminated. Sounds fair to me.

up
Voting closed 9

.

up
Voting closed 10

The stupider the bureaucracy, the easier it is to circumvent. It says something that the law and the store wouldn't know or care if he had told her what beer to get in advance and she bought it when he wasn't there, then handed it to him somewhere else.

up
Voting closed 5