Hey, there! Log in / Register

Boston City Council votes to accept federal grants for planting trees, housing migrants and upgrading three Roxbury streets, except for Councilor Flynn, who played Dr. No

The Boston City Council yesterday voted to accept millions of dollars in federal grants for projects across the city, including $20 million to upgrade Melnea Cass Boulevard, Malcolm X Boulevard and Warren Street in Roxbury, $11.4 million to plant hundreds of new trees and bolster an urban-forestry work training program and $2.3 million in two separate grants to help upgrade, expand and staff a Boston Rescue Mission program downtown that houses and train immigrants released from federal detention.

In all the cases, the council voted 12-1 to accept the grants.

Councilor Ed Flynn (South Boston, South End, Chinatown, Downtown) cast the lone no vote in all the cases.

Flynn said he wasn't necessarily opposed to the grants but objected to the way the council agreed to vote on them without first having committee hearings on them, because he wants to investigate how taxpayer money is being spent. Normally, matters before the council first are assigned to the relevant council committee, which then holds at least one public hearing and a "working session" before going back to the council for a vote, but councilors can ask for suspension of that rule and immediate passage of a measure if, for some reason, time is of the essence.

Other councilors, however, said time is now of the essence, either because the council's 2024 legislative session ends next month or because of the new administration coming into office in Washington, and that they were satisfied with detailed explanations forwarded by administration officials in charge of the programs.

Council President Ruthzee Louijeune noted that when Flynn held that job, he routinely allowed grants to come to a vote without a hearing before a committee, but Flynn held fast - although he did vote yes on two other donations without hearings, of 200 turkeys from Roche Bros. and 100 turkeys from TD Garden for needy Boston residents. The dollar amounts of those donations, however, fell well under the $1 million value Flynn set for deciding he always wants hearings.

"I do come to this building every day, five days a week and I do look forward to having hearings," Flynn said in response to a request for approval of a $11.4 million grant from the US Department of Agriculture's Forestry Service to plant at least 2,500 new trees across Boston, improve the patches in which existing trees now sometimes struggle to survive and to pay to train local residents in urban forestry as a career.

"I like to learn about the proposals and I like to study them and I like to ask questions and engage the administration staff on issues that are impacting the city." he said. "This is a particular issue I would be interested in. I need to do my due diligence as a city councilor to learn about funding when it's taxpayer money. I can't, I can't vote for something if we don't have all the answers."

Councilor Gabriela Coletta Zapata, who asked for an immediate vote on accepting the grant, however, said Flynn knew about the measure and could have talked to her beforehand, but didn't.

"We all know the urgency around this sort of docket [item]," she said. "We have a president elect who has talked about dismantling the EPA and this is $11.4 million that will help fund trees in the city of Boston. I don't have any questions about it."

Councilor Liz Breadon (Allston/Brighton) joined Coletta Zapata: "We have an incoming presidential administration that is going to tear everything that we stand for apart: EPA, environmental justice, all of it," she said. "All of it is on the chopping block, and these are federal grants, some of them are very significant grants, there's no guarantee we'll ever, ever, ever get a grant like this in the future, in this next incoming administration. We have a responsibility to look at what we've got in front of us, look at the time on the clock, and move as many of these federal grants as quickly and as effectively as possible."

She added the concept of tree planting and urban forestry is nothing new, the city Parks Department and PowerCorpsBos have been involved in both for years and the council has exercised its oversight through past budge hearings. She said she agreed that in "normal times," the measure should have a public hearing before a council committee first, but: "These are not normal times and we have very little time to get to it and get this done before January 20."

Councilor Julia Mejia, who was thwarted earlier in the year - by councilors who included Flynn - in an attempt to have a hearing held on a federal grant that would include funding for surveillance technologies by Boston Police, said she appreciated Flynn's devotion to process and hearings, but added that "not everything has to be a fight and when we do fight, it should be for something worth fighting for," and planting trees just is not one of those things. She then briefly assumed the role of Elsa from "Frozen" and sang "Let it go, let it go, let it go!"

Flynn also voted against a $20-million grant from the Federal Transit Authority which, in conjunction with another $12.5 million appropriated by the city, would pay for the redesign of three key Roxbury streets to make them easier for people in various modes of transportation and better able to survive flooding in more intense storms. Flynn, who sits on the Planning, Development and Transportation committee that would have dealt with the issue, knew no hearing had been held yet still rose to ask Councilor Sharon Durkan (Back Bay, Bay Village, Beacon Hill, Fenway, Mission Hill), who chairs the committee, whether it had had a hearing on the grant.

Durkan, who spent much of the meeting upset with Flynn and his sometimes supporter Erin Murphy (at large), declined to answer and instead simply asked for a vote, which resulted in a 12-1 approval of the grant.

He similarly opposed two grants, totaling $2.3 million, from Homeland Security, to be split between the Boston Public Health Commission and the Boston Rescue Mission to house and support "non-citizen migrants recently released from DHS custody."

Earlier in the council meeting, Durkan expressed frustration at Flynn's - and Murphy's - tactics through a particular parliamentary procedure.

Murphy called for an immediate vote - despite the lack of a hearing - on a $50,000 state grant to the Hyde Park Community Center that would pay for various events and activities the center has already begun to organize.

Durkan, however, objected, which under the council's rules, means the measure could not be voted on and would first have to go before a council committee for a public hearing - which might not be able to be scheduled until after the events at the center were to have taken place.

Durkan said she has nothing against the grant but objected to the way some councilors, and she named Murphy specifically, pull stuff like this with grants all the time. "Do you see the point I'm making?" she asked.

Later in the meeting, however, Murphy again moved that the grant be accepted and this time it was.

Murphy did join Flynn to make up an 11-2 minority on a measure that would help settle a lawsuit by a Roxbury canvas and sail company involving land along Albany Street that the Boston Water and Sewer Commission rented to the company then decided it needed the land back and granted itself easements on the land via eminent domain.

The company, Harry Miller sued over the effective abrogation of its 35-year lease. Then the commission realized it didn't need the land after all and reached an agreement with the company to reverse the land takings, which would end the suit in Suffolk Superior Court.

Durkan called for an immediate vote because "without passing [the measure] today, this settlement may fall apart."

But Flynn called for a hearing first, or even just a look at a document from the city legal department explaining the nature of the suit, the proposed settlement and the financial ramifications of it.

Neighborhoods: 
Topics: 


Ad:


Like the job UHub is doing? Consider a contribution. Thanks!

Comments

God can Flynn just announce he's running for mayor already? The Staten-Island-flavor posture of being from the city but always pushing against it is super contrived, and as a constituent it doesn't do us any favors. Any mention of the tyranny of bike lanes in any of his quotes?

up
81

I mean, they're probably part of the Melnea Cass/Malcolm X/Warren Street planning, which did come up, but not his district, so ...

up
28

Piss off with the New York City reference.

"Well in New York, we do it this way." Blah blah blah.

Hop your rear on the Acela and go back to where you came from Met fan. This is Boston.

up
16

Ed! You're here!

Thrilled to be a multi-decade resident of Boston, and even happier when a glancing reference to NYC gets an authentic "go back to where you came from!" Just spot on reaction.

John, would you have taken the $11M in federal tax dollars?

up
25

They said "Staten Island-flavor." I don't love New York sports either, but the analogy was fair.

This is beneath your usual quality standard.

up
38

I think you need to re-read that reference.

up
33

You took it totally out of context. It was a logical and apt descriptor.

Turn your townie-o-meter down a notch.

up
43

I'm guessing you don't know anything about New York, Mr. "This is Boston" with your kneejerk defensiveness. Staten Island is the borough where all the throwbacks live, and a Staten Island reference is a way of saying that the individual being referred to is a small-town-in-a-big-city provincial knucklehead.

up
17

I've said it before and I'll say it again. Go away Flynn. You're not helping.

wtf dude, you clearly are trying to make a name for yourself by not voting on any of these.. like you 'care' about how tax payers' $ is being spent now. You didn't before, and were called out in this meeting about that.

I hope this guy loses the election (he will anyways) and just goes away for good. You are not your father, Ed.

up
83

You'll notice they voted to accept the funding, not to ensure the funds are properly expended for their intended purpose and properly accounted for.

up
15

.

You know how tax dollars are spent in Boston? They go to the federal government. When they offer you a grant, that's your constituents getting their own money back in the form of services.

South Boston was a joke to me the entire 19 years I lived in Boston, and it still is.

up
43

Because come January the spigot will be shut off.

up
21

New trees is great. If only they cared for and not let die the existing trees.

up
31

That urban forestry work-training program probably includes caring for existing trees.

up
24

Probably does a lot of work here.

I'd think a blind squirrel like you would want more trees to increase your chance of finding a nut some day.

up
11

That is part of the grant. That's what urban forestry means.

up
23

Is there a job posting for this on Boston.gov?

Must there always be one?

To the point where when Frank ‘The Crank’ Baker stepped down there was an ad hoc group formed to determine who would step up to the plate?

up
15

He thinks he stands for something, but he's really just a speed bump.

Medford had one named Penta. I referred to him as "pentinane", a substance that is highly reactive but obstructs everything around it. The absolute opposite of a catalyst.

up
17

They are called the "resist" movement. Word is, none of them own any mirrors.

Will federal infusions become rarer and if so is there wiggle room in how to spend it?

Boston is the capital of the bluest state in the nation. Trump will do absolutely everything he can to siphon the disproportionately greater tax dollars from this blue state and give them to red states so they can post the ten commandments on the walls of every public classroom.

up
14

I don’t know our complete federal funding portfolio, but a good bit must be baked-in by law and can’t be stemmed by fiat, but it probably won’t take many turns of the spigot to have his desired effects. Still, the Ma Republican and Democrat billionaires will continue do well. (As they do under either Party such as they are.)

"...because of the new administration coming into office in Washington"

That's why, that's absolutely why. The new Presidential administration hates the City of Boston and Massachusetts in general. One thing the President-elect never forgets is a slight. Trump has never won in Massachusetts. Boston declared itself a "Sanctuary City". ICE agents were prevented from hauling illegal immigrants out of courts.

I wouldn't be surprised if Boston was chosen as the test city for his plan to use US military forces on American soil to further his promised agenda completely ignoring the Posse Comitatus Act.

up
19

April 19, 2025, too.

Anyone have a horse? And two lanterns?

No little green men coming.
When the process gets in motion nation-wide it’s possible that the theoretical flood of unlawful migrants to our sanctuary state will have us acting well before we need to call feds for help. And, if we do need fed help, we may not get it…immediately.

How will this play out if the indicators tick up? How much tolerance do our politicians have for letting sought violent criminals slip through the back door? Who will blink?

As in aliens, but the United States Military will definitely have a role in the upcoming Mass Deportations.

Not only has President-Elect Trump made this a priority of his upcoming administration but he has nominated Tom Homan as his so-called Border Czar (a position that doesn't officially exist in the US Federal government). Here's what he has to say:

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trumps-border-czar-makes-big-promise-if-st...

Speaking of position that don't officially exist in the US Federal government; President-Elect Trump has appointed Marjorie Taylor Greene to chair the subcommittee for the Department of Government Efficiency along with Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy. Here's what she has to say about their priorities.

https://www.newsweek.com/marjorie-taylor-greene-warns-doge-subcommittee-...

Unless Donald Trump has radically changed his administrative style Boston and the State of Massachusetts are going to see very little Federal Government assistance during the next 4 years.

based on arbitrary whims will be challenged in court against the Administrative Procedures Act. The government can certainly punish states by pulling funding when those states don't go along with the policies of the federal government, but that needs to be done through established Congressional channels based on standards applied universally. But the actions or inactions of our state elected officials will certainly influence any discretionary assistance. You can choose to try to compromise and get along or you can choose to be a rogue "resistor" to everything, and completely fail your constituents. I'm guessing we'll see a lot of the latter track.

Why would the President-Elect care about Congessional/Governmental oversight? He's been ignoring it since before he won the election by not signing the memorandum of understanding with the General Service Administration to insure a smooth transition of power. Donald Trump doesn't care about political norms.

I saw that clearly in his first administration.

is not Congress, nor a court, nor an oversight agency.

when all these crazy far leftists voted down accepting a ton of DHS funding. He just wants to have a conversation about how the monies will be used. That's it. They want to cram their agenda down your throat and when you ask to have a simple conversation, they all gang up on you like bullies and name-call. Self awareness is seriously lacking among many of these clowns as well as some of the commentators here. What goes around comes around.

You get what the majority voted for @eddie.

Sherlock. That doesn't justify refusing to consider or hear the minority point of view. It also does not justify denying the public an open debate on the merits of the issues. You can roll that way in life, but don't complain when you're on the short end of the stick with no opportunity to be heard. ;)